fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #1509 ]

⌈ Secret Post #1509 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

16.

__________________________________________________

17.

__________________________________________________

18.

__________________________________________________

19.

__________________________________________________

20.

__________________________________________________

21.

__________________________________________________

22.

__________________________________________________

23.

__________________________________________________

24.

__________________________________________________

25.

__________________________________________________

26.

__________________________________________________

27.

__________________________________________________

28.

__________________________________________________

29.

__________________________________________________

30.

__________________________________________________

31.

__________________________________________________

32.

__________________________________________________

33.

__________________________________________________

34.

__________________________________________________

35.

__________________________________________________

36.

__________________________________________________

37.

__________________________________________________

38.

__________________________________________________

39.

__________________________________________________

40.

__________________________________________________

41.

__________________________________________________

42.

__________________________________________________

43.

__________________________________________________

44.

__________________________________________________

45.

__________________________________________________

46.

__________________________________________________

47.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 16 pages, 376 secrets from Secret Submission Post #216.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

But Snape didn't have to continue the cycle of abuse. I mean, Harry also had a horrible childhood, but didn't become an abusive jerk. It was Snape's choices that made him awful, not his childhood.

No, Snape did not have to continue the cycle of abuse. However, I am saying that -because- Snape did have these painful childhood experiences, it makes him a more sympathetic character. It is very difficult to grow up into a non-abusive adult when the seed of abuse is planted into you at an early age. If all you knew as a child was violence, you have a much harder time reacting differently as an adult. But that is what being an adult is all about: taking responsibility for your actions. Not being able to heal and grow from his childhood abuse was Snape's weakness.
Harry was obviously stronger. We saw at various times that he -could- have become someone like Snape or Voldemort, but he made a conscious effort to be better.

The problem with Petunia is that she has no such excuse. When we meet her, she is not dirty and unkempt as Snape is. She obviously has a stable home life. Yes, she suffered a major disappointment as a child, but that happens to everyone. I wanted nothing more than to grow up to be a singer when I was younger, but I didn't have any musical talent. It broke my heart, but I moved on and found other talents. That's life.
I am more willing to forgive Snape for not being strong enough to overcome his abuse than I am Petunia's petty jealousy. Petunia had a good family and a sister who loved her, but she chose to let her envy poison that relationship instead of focusing her energy elsewhere.

tl;dr: It takes more strength to overcome childhood abuse than a childhood disappointment. Everyone experiences disappointment in their life. That Petunia couldn't get over hers (and used it as a reason to abuse an innocent child who was entirely dependent on her) makes her an exceptionally weak character.

Why couldn't I just say this?! My God, I failed so hard trying to explain myself.

To be honest, I think the problem lies in the people you were trying to convince. They're reacting a little personally to any imagined Petunia-snark.

I honestly don't feel very strongly for either character but I feel that we know more about Snape than we do about Petunia and that what we know makes him a more sympathetic. I don't consider the hypothetical because it's not in the text. If it's not in the text (or implied in the text), then I don't see the point of arguing over it. So when people say "we don't know Petunia's background. She could have been abused as a child," I don't put much weight behind that because I honestly think that if JK felt it were truly important, she would have put it in the books.

I don't consider the hypothetical because it's not in the text. If it's not in the text (or implied in the text), then I don't see the point of arguing over it. So when people say "we don't know Petunia's background. She could have been abused as a child," I don't put much weight behind that because I honestly think that if JK felt it were truly important, she would have put it in the books.

Yes, thank you. But I think we can easily infer that Petunia was not abused because (1) the way she is described versus the way other (clearly abused) children are described and (2) child-abuse is a big theme in Rowling's series. She would not hesitate to include this detail if that was the case.

Another major theme in Rowling's book is that we choose to become the people we are. Whether we are given a bad lot in life and become bad (Voldemort), we are given a bad lot in life and become good (Harry), we are given a good lot in life and become bad (Petunia), or we are given a good lot in life can become good (Lily). I mean, I absolutely oversimplified it, but I think that is the bare-bones of this theme. I have a suspicion that the reason Rowling only showed Petunia's motive in being terrible is to illustrate this point. Whereas, with Snape, she took a little more care in telling us about his tragic childhood and his conflicting emotions. Snape was set up to be an antihero, whereas while we did feel sorry for Petunia, the impression we are ultimately left with is that she could not overcome her jealousy and therefore became a bad person.

But...I'm just preaching to the choir.

HALLELUJAH! haha

Actually, I think most of them are reacting to the way Snape's poor behavior is just glossed over in an effort to say Petunia is the worst of the two. Especially in HP fandom where we have the Snapewives and a huge sector that loves to romanticize what is essentially a dysfunctional, abusive, unkind character because he's portrayed by Alan Rickman and/or because he was manipulated into doing the "right" thing in the end.

But yeah, okay, it's all because Petunia actually has this huge secret fanbase.

I can only comment on what I've seen in this thread (which is what I was doing), as I'm not in the HP fandom. Those who are arguing that Snape is a more sympathetic character than Petunia are fully acknowledging that he's a dysfunctional, abusive and unkind character.

If you have an issue with those "Snapewives," as you call them, take it up with them. What's the point of doing so with people who aren't attempting to make a Saint of Snape, but are simply pointing out some very obvious differences between these two characters?

[ SECRET POST #1509 ]

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject