[ SECRET POST #150 ]

[grayout.livejournal.com]

⌈ Secret Post #150 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.





Notes:

pedo pedo pedooooo

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 65 secrets from Secret Submission Post #022.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuessday, June 5th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[pimmy.livejournal.com]

2. as much as i dont like sounding like an arse, i agree. i can understand people who were kicked unjustly, but all i get from everyone else is the same vibe i get from the kids in highschool complaining about getting in trouble for DOING ILLEGAL THINGS.

[pimmy.livejournal.com]

true (though i find it weird that it isn't) but i dunno, if someones being an uber creepy pedo and stuff, or practically admitting to being a supporter to it and stuff.. i think thats pretty alarm worthy. or atleast very very not comfortable to have around! i dunno. its fine as a fetish or whatnot, and gosh knows how often i joke about that stuff, but why broadcast it?

[ew-younerd.livejournal.com]

Not illegal

[pimmy.livejournal.com]

i was more reffering to my example, and the fact that the actual act and not just writing about it is illegal. yea, badly worded. sry :(

[ew-younerd.livejournal.com]

Does everyone that fangirls a digimon or pokemon character or a naruto (pre timeskip) character constitute as a pedo to you then? If someone has a crush on Sonic or Pepe le pew does that mean they want to fuck real hedgehogs and skunks? Creepy as shota and loli may be, ...well, you get where i'm going with this since you've probably heard the rant tons of times :P and I don't want to waste your time ♥ there's nothing wrong with being creeped out by the stuff, but it's artistic license and freedom (however LJ does have a right to choose what to and what not to allow...but a sudden random change in policy with no previous warning was what made that all so fucked up)

[pimmy.livejournal.com]

oh nono, heck i crushed on good ol' Rock Lee for a while! Theres a difference between that and outright pedo fetishes of course D: but yea. lj DID kinda mess up a bit there, but like sugartits is saying above me, why are people broadcasting that? XD

[kurage-no-hone.livejournal.com]

Funny thing is, writing chan/shota/incest/whatever unethical sex act you can imagine is perfectly legal.* Freedom of speech, y'know. (And yes, I understand that lj, as a private enterprise, has every right to disallow whatever speech it does not like. However we, as paying customers, just as equally have every right to decide we do not like their policies and threaten a massive fannish exodus.)

Bottom line: writing about an illegal act ≠ committing an illegal act.

*Of course, if the work in question is a derivative piece (read: fanfiction) then it becomes not-so-legal, for reasons that have everything to do with copyright and nothing to do with sex. This is true of even the most sparkling, squeaky-clean, smut-free fic out there.

[pimmy.livejournal.com]

yes yes, i know XD see above posts, this is what not sleeping in 2 days does to me. like i said, i dont agree with bannin' the innocent, but theres definatly some types of people that shouldnt be kept around.

[panksters.livejournal.com]

I agree with you like five thousand percent. of course, sugartits and ew_younerd peed on my face because of it BUT ALL I'M SAYIN IS THAT if you go around telling people you like little boys having sex, you're a big creepy creep and everyone has the right to hate you.

I AM GLAD OTHER PEOPLE AGREE WITH ME.

[pimmy.livejournal.com]

haha, yea its easy to be missenterpreted in this sort of discussion. i mean, i have friends with some PRETTY weird fetishes, but outright pedophiles..? blah!

[panksters.livejournal.com]

That's like hanging out with someone who talks about how they have sex with their dog.