ext_278733 ([identity profile] grayout.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-06-04 05:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #150 ]


⌈ Secret Post #150 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.





Notes:

pedo pedo pedooooo

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 65 secrets from Secret Submission Post #022.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuessday, June 5th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 13

(Anonymous) 2007-06-05 11:29 am (UTC)(link)
I has no trouble with the porn, rly, m/f, f/f, m/m = all good (depending on how the subject matter's treated in each case). Problem with DA, though, to me==the same thing as the problem with Getty Images or any other image site--it's just *way* easier to find images of naked women than of naked men, 'cause the female body's thought of differently than the male body. Even if an artist isn't thinking 'fap, fap, fap', even if he/she doesn't even like women 'that way', and just wants to photograph -a- body like a landscape or use it like a piece of a still life--it's a woman's body 9 times out of 10--not even because the artist's turned on by any of it--just because the female body's considered a mute artistic object like a bowl of oranges or a pitcher and like the male body is not. (As the old Guerilla girls poster went, 'Do women have to be naked to get into the Met Museum?'.) Guess I just like to see some equal treatment for both sexes on that score.