Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2011-04-05 03:54 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #1554 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1554 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Knut The Polar Bear]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Invader Zim]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Can't Hardly Wait]
__________________________________________________
05.
[Arthur C. Clarke's Odyssey series]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Robert Knepper/Prison Break]
__________________________________________________
07.

[The Prophecy, Christopher Walken]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Skins]
__________________________________________________
09.

[In a Fix, on TLC]
__________________________________________________
10.

[UK TV/Radio]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Homestuck and Puella Magi Madoka Magica]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Shameless US]
__________________________________________________
13.

[Young Justice]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Rose of Versailles]
__________________________________________________
15.

[Dr. Horrible]
__________________________________________________
16.

[Tangled]
__________________________________________________
17.

[Homestuck]
__________________________________________________
18.

[Severus Snape/Lolita KompleX]
__________________________________________________
19.

[Alien loves Predator]
__________________________________________________
20.

[TFL]
__________________________________________________
21.

[Regular Show]
__________________________________________________
22.

[Summer Wars]
__________________________________________________
23.

[Glee]
__________________________________________________
24.

[Ace Attorney]
__________________________________________________
25.

[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]
__________________________________________________
26.

[Fringe]
__________________________________________________
27.

[k-pop]
__________________________________________________
28.

[Stargate SG1, Legend of the Seeker, Rizzoli & Isles]
__________________________________________________
29.

[Sailor Moon]
__________________________________________________
30.

[The Spoony Experiment]
__________________________________________________
31.

[MSLN]
__________________________________________________
32.

[Todd In The Shadows/Infomania]
__________________________________________________
33.

[Roman Polanski and Woody Allen]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 120 secrets from Secret Submission Post #222.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - not English ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
but he didn't know any better at the time.
Yes he did. He was an adult who possessed a normal functioning brain, and he was in a country where having underage sex with a minor was and is illegal. Age of consent laws aside, he may also have already been in a relationship with Nastassja Kinski (who was between 15 or 17) at the time, and most folks sure as HELL know better than to cheat on their current girlfriends.
He thought that it was consensual sex since the girl's mother pretty much gave two thumbs up at the proposition of Romanski having some alone time with her daughter
A normal thinking adult knows that a girl's mother giving permission for her daughter to have a private photo shoot does NOT equal, "It's okay for you to have sex with her." And even if he thought it was consensual sex, he STILL shouldn't have touched the girl because oh yeah, she was kind of still a minor.
even though the girl objected at first, she stopped resisting after awhile
Said girl testifies she stopped resisting because, "I didn’t know what else would happen if I made a scene" and, "I figured well, I guess I’ll get to come home after this." Ceasing resistance does not equal giving consent. And even if she HAD consented it's irrelevant under California law.
Of course it was rape, but Romanski may not have been the brightest crayon in the box at the time it all happened (remember Sharon Tate, guys?)
Sharon Tate's murder happened in August 1969. The sexual assault happened in March 1977. That's eight years. I highly doubt Polanski's grief over Sharon or whatever was still clouding his mind. Even assuming he was still in a bad place mentally because of her murder, he STILL knew enough not to provide alcohol to and then have sex with a minor.
She was thirteen. She was off-limits. Even if she was consenting and complicit (and we only have his word on that and I'm disinclined to believe him), it was illegal for him to have sex with her. He did anyway. While she was telling him no. And may have been impaired by alcohol.
And I seriously doubt he's going to have sex with anyone who's underage ever again.
Oh, well, that's all fine and dandy but it doesn't change the fact that he committed a serious crime and has yet to serve his jail sentence for that crime.
Even though you preface your statements with "What Polanski did was unacceptable", these are damn troubling things to say and regardless of how you intended them they really make you seem like you're trying to whitewash the man's crimes.
This is not okay.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-06 03:41 am (UTC)(link)He lost his pregnant wife to murder. I can't imagine that's something you get over ever. People always go on about how damaging rape is, and it is, but I'd imagine that losing your pregnant wife to a random, violent murder is just about as hard to get over (I say having experienced neither).
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-06 04:04 am (UTC)(link)I don't appreciate the snarky icon though.
no subject
Also sorry about the icon. It's the only Rage-y icon I have and the statements did make me legitimately angry. I should probably get myself a new one though, if it comes off as snarky. My apologies.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-06 04:16 am (UTC)(link)I understand it ragey, but I took it as ragey against me, as opposed to against Polanski/trivializing what he did. Truce!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-06 11:54 am (UTC)(link)You know what most of them don't do in response? Anally rape an underage child. I don't care if you've seen your entire family slaughtered in front of you, if you're undergoing any sort of trauma. There are no excuses for rape.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-04-06 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)Everyone should go read Jeffrey Toobin's piece in the New Yorker on Polanski from December 09. Very... enlightening. I'd link it but you can't read it all online. Alternatively it's in Best American Crime Reporting 2010.
no subject