[ SECRET POST #155 ]

[grayout.livejournal.com]

⌈ Secret Post #155 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 114 secrets from Secret Submission Post #023.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Sunday, June 10th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[allsunday.livejournal.com]

Oh, I see the difference in what we're saying now.

Yes, you can certainly be uncomfortable with someone talking about it, or uncomfortable with reading about it, simply because as an asexual, that is not where your interests lay. I'm sure you would much rather talk about or read about something else. It's if sex in general squicks you - as in, "sex is dirty and wrong, period" - that something is wrong with you. Sex is perfectly natural, and no one should be under the impression that it's a bad thing, though you may choose not to engage in it.

Does that make more sense? I'm sorry if I wasn't as clear as I intended to be.

[(Anonymous)]

I think armpit hair is dirty and wrong, period. It's perfectly natural. It's still dirty and wrong. Gross.

[allsunday.livejournal.com]

Hope you never go to the beach anywhere in Europe.

[dea-matrona.livejournal.com]

Again, not an appropreate analogy. There is a difference between something being natural and something being one of the basic human drives.

[(Anonymous)]

"Sex is perfectly natural, and no one should be under the impression that it's a bad thing"

Not necessarily bad, just... wrong in the sense that 'augh, why would people want to do that?' Because people can do it if they want, but why should someone want to do something like that?

-> "sex is dirty and wrong, period"

I think this is an exaggeration of the original point, perhaps

[allsunday.livejournal.com]

Not necessarily bad, just... wrong in the sense that 'augh, why would people want to do that?' Because people can do it if they want, but why should someone want to do something like that?

Because it's fun?

I think this is an exaggeration of the original point, perhaps

I was trying to make the distinction obvious.

[anna-chronism.livejournal.com]

Not necessarily bad, just... wrong in the sense that 'augh, why would people want to do that?' Because people can do it if they want, but why should someone want to do something like that?

Kinda makes me think of smoking. Totally gross, but people do it because they like it anyway.

(I don't know if I actually had a point there.)

[jetaimerai.livejournal.com]

(Jumping into this late, sorry)

Oh, I dunno, I think people like having orgasms. That seems like a totally normal reason to want to have sex, no matter how messy it is. But maybe that's just me?