case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2011-06-10 07:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #1620 ]

⌈ Secret Post #1620 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.
[Ano Hi Mita Hana no Namae wo Bokutachi wa Mada Shiranai]



__________________________________________________

02.
[Hetalia]


__________________________________________________

03.
[Magical Girl Lyrical Nanoha]


__________________________________________________

04.
[Michael Silas/Asiel Hardison, Lady Gaga's dancers]


__________________________________________________

05.
[Tiger & Bunny]


__________________________________________________

06.
[Evangelion]


__________________________________________________

07.
[Zero Punctuation]


__________________________________________________

08.
[The Catherine Tate Show]


__________________________________________________

09.
[Grimgrimoire]


__________________________________________________

10.
[wonderful days, guyver, cowboy bebop, texhnolyze, togainu no chi, black lagoon, samurai champloo, aishiteruze baby, tenjo tenge]


__________________________________________________

11.
[X-Men: First Class]


__________________________________________________

12.
[Tales of the Abyss]


__________________________________________________

13.
[Human Target]


__________________________________________________

14.
[A Song of Ice and Fire]


__________________________________________________

15.
[Masterchef Australia]


__________________________________________________

16.
[Sucker Punch]


__________________________________________________

17.
[Mystique]


__________________________________________________

18.
[Workaholics]


__________________________________________________

19.
[Mark Reads]


__________________________________________________

20.
[Jamie Campbell Bower ]


__________________________________________________

21.
[Hey Arnold!]












[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]












__________________________________________________

22. [SPOILERS for Homestuck]



__________________________________________________

23. [SPOILERS for Gintama]



__________________________________________________

24. [SPOILERS for Kamen Rider Kabuto]



__________________________________________________

25. [SPOILERS for Loveless]



__________________________________________________

26. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who]



__________________________________________________

27. [SPOILERS for Mockingjay]



__________________________________________________

28. [SPOILERS for Kung Fu Panda 2]

















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]


















__________________________________________________

29. [TRIGGER WARNING for non-con]



__________________________________________________

30. [TRIGGER WARNING for rape]

[Game of Thrones]


__________________________________________________

31. [TRIGGER WARNING for eating disorders]



__________________________________________________

32. [TRIGGER WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________

33. [TRIGGER WARNING for transphobia?]



__________________________________________________

34. [TRIGGER WARNING for rape]

[SPN]


__________________________________________________

35. [TRIGGER WARNING for rape, pedophilia]



__________________________________________________

36. [TRIGGER WARNING for eating disorders]



__________________________________________________

37. [TRIGGER WARNING for self-injury, suicide]

[Manic Street Preachers]






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #231.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] tawabids.livejournal.com 2011-06-11 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, if it was some dude in a chick flick using his professorship to pick up chicks I wouldn't care, but the film is ABOUT the competition between sub-species in a diverging population, IT IS DIRECTLY RELEVANT TO THE ENTIRE PLOT whether or not Xavier gets his terminology right.

You see what you've done, film, you've made me capslock rage. You're just lucky you kept distracting me with Michael Fassbender's neck. Mmmm.

(Anonymous) 2011-06-11 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
in spite of ruining my enjoyment of the film and coming off as ignorant... what would be the correct terminology? i genuinely want to know, it's been a while since i've learnt about evolution at school and my grasp of the english language can be kind of hazy (esl nonny here) so i didn't quite get what objective process means. tried googling it even, but alas

tl;dr just want to know what to you is glaringly obvious (i get the part about "less evolved" and racist arguments though, that's just... yeah, no, what even-)

[identity profile] tawabids.livejournal.com 2011-06-11 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
Oh don't worry, I just meant that there's no such thing as "more evolved" or "less evolved" or "evolving towards" (eg, we wouldn't say the Australopithecines, if they are our ancestors, were "proto-human" because every species, in its proper era and environment, is at its 'peak' - no species in evolution is aiming towards a future species). So a biology professor obviously wouldn't use terminology like 'less evolved'.

By "objective" I meant that there isn't a separate criteria for measuring how 'evolved' a species is - we don't say "neanderthals were more evolved that Australopithecine because they came later in time". If evolution had 'progress' or 'goals' there would need to be some outside force thinking up those goals. Eg, If you believe that evolution exists TO produce humans as an end result than you could say 'neanderthals are more evolved than Australopithecine, but most scientists of evolution don't believe that. We believe evolution can't know the future, it is a process that can only adapt to the current environment it is in.

It sounds like you understand the concepts pretty well, though ;) your English is great.

(Anonymous) 2011-06-11 02:15 am (UTC)(link)
oh yeah, makes sense. thank you for explaining it so patiently! a pretty weird mistake to make in a movie that leans so heavily on evolution... but then again, as also said before, this is hollywood :X

[identity profile] tawabids.livejournal.com 2011-06-11 02:18 am (UTC)(link)
Hollywood's lucky. I wish I had a job where I got away with making up facts! :D
ext_6866: (Sigh.  Monet.)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2011-06-11 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, and I think what makes it all the more frustrating is evolution as a subject is so intentionally mangled in the real world and the facts intentionally not taught. It's not like people don't actually say on TV things like "If evolution were real how come monkeys don't talk yet?" Of course, X-Men's playing fast and loose with the concepts anyway, but if they'er going to talk about real evolution in the past they could at least get that right and have Xavier talk like a person who'd studied the subject would talk.

[identity profile] tawabids.livejournal.com 2011-06-11 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
I totally agree. It's maddening because it's just not that hard to get right. It's not like he's talking the finer points quantum physics here, the concepts are easily graspable by a high school student. Yet misinformation about those concepts is what allows the creationism lobby to get away with pushing an unscientific agenda in science class :/

...one can only assume that Xavier slept his way to his professorship XD