Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2011-06-10 07:51 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2011-06-10 07:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #1620 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
[Ano Hi Mita Hana no Namae wo Bokutachi wa Mada Shiranai]
__________________________________________________
02.
[Hetalia]
__________________________________________________
03.
[Magical Girl Lyrical Nanoha]
__________________________________________________
04.
[Michael Silas/Asiel Hardison, Lady Gaga's dancers]
__________________________________________________
05.
[Tiger & Bunny]
__________________________________________________
06.
[Evangelion]
__________________________________________________
07.
[Zero Punctuation]
__________________________________________________
08.
[The Catherine Tate Show]
__________________________________________________
09.
[Grimgrimoire]
__________________________________________________
10.
[wonderful days, guyver, cowboy bebop, texhnolyze, togainu no chi, black lagoon, samurai champloo, aishiteruze baby, tenjo tenge]
__________________________________________________
11.
[X-Men: First Class]
__________________________________________________
12.
[Tales of the Abyss]
__________________________________________________
13.
[Human Target]
__________________________________________________
14.
[A Song of Ice and Fire]
__________________________________________________
15.
[Masterchef Australia]
__________________________________________________
16.
[Sucker Punch]
__________________________________________________
17.
[Mystique]
__________________________________________________
18.
[Workaholics]
__________________________________________________
19.
[Mark Reads]
__________________________________________________
20.
[Jamie Campbell Bower ]
__________________________________________________
21.
[Hey Arnold!]
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
__________________________________________________
22. [SPOILERS for Homestuck]
__________________________________________________
23. [SPOILERS for Gintama]
__________________________________________________
24. [SPOILERS for Kamen Rider Kabuto]
__________________________________________________
25. [SPOILERS for Loveless]
__________________________________________________
26. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who]
__________________________________________________
27. [SPOILERS for Mockingjay]
__________________________________________________
28. [SPOILERS for Kung Fu Panda 2]
[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
__________________________________________________
29. [TRIGGER WARNING for non-con]
__________________________________________________
30. [TRIGGER WARNING for rape]
[Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
31. [TRIGGER WARNING for eating disorders]
__________________________________________________
32. [TRIGGER WARNING for rape]
__________________________________________________
33. [TRIGGER WARNING for transphobia?]
__________________________________________________
34. [TRIGGER WARNING for rape]
[SPN]
__________________________________________________
35. [TRIGGER WARNING for rape, pedophilia]
__________________________________________________
36. [TRIGGER WARNING for eating disorders]
__________________________________________________
37. [TRIGGER WARNING for self-injury, suicide]
[Manic Street Preachers]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #231.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.
no subject
I am not defining a 'strong' female character by her physical strength/independence/accomplishment/power/whatever. When I say 'strong' female character, I mean the quality of writing of the said character. Regardless whether she is a meek, failure-at-life doormat or a queen who overcame all obstacles to become a turning point in the development of a civilisation, when I say 'strong', I mean how much her character resonated for me as a reader and how effectively (or even originally) the author managed to capture her depth for me to at least understand her as a person, if not relate to her.
GRRM just failed to measure up to this for me. I found the way he deals with characterisation to be average, especially when it comes to the women. In his writing, I see more character types than actual characters- most of them are obvious prototypes that have been done to death everywhere already and this is OK, because it is a fact that there are NO new stories and no new characters left for anyone to write (at least not in mainstream fiction). There are no new motives left to discover which haven't already been written by someone, so this is not the thing that decides strength or quality of plot and characterisation. The quality of characters, or 'strength' as I put it, is how the writer handles them in his own, original way.
From what I read of GRRM (and bear in mind that I am only talking about the first book here), he failed to deal with any of his motives and prototypes in a manner which would make them particularly interesting or memorable for me. I am not talking about strength and weakness in the literal sense.
These characters, while not entirely weak, are average at best. They are certainly not strong, unique or particularly well written. This is what I mean with my comment. It is entirely my fault for not making this clear and assuming everyone else was talking about that too.
I am not a feminist (as you so inaccurately put it) chirping about misogyny in a world that was supposed to be misogynistic. That is another issue altogether and on this subject I quote what another user above me said: 'The story doesn't need to be misogynistic itself to uphold misogynistic conventions. It contains a huge, glaring, complex subject, and fails to speak interestingly on that subject.' And this definitely is a problem with Game of Thrones.
Of course, this does tie in with what I was saying about the characterisation. Dealing with complex issues in a superficial manner is definitely an overall problem for the book. However, since I haven't read the whole series, I am perfectly willing to give it the benefit of the doubt that it does get better and concede that I may be missing the bigger picture here, so once again, I have to stress; my opinion applies only to Game of Thrones.
no subject
You know, that makes sense to me, actually -- I do remember thinking that basically all of his characters (except Tyrion) felt largely archetypal to me by the end of GoT -- fun, yes, but I didn't really get all of the love from fandom. And then the rest of the series happened, and almost everyone's stories went in bizarre directions that I didn't really expect, and at this point most of the characters are fascinating and very three dimensional to me. Hopefully you'll end up feeling the same way, because I found it quite a fun ride.
no subject
I think that's also why I/others found your original comment so off putting: Basically everyone I've talked to agrees that the series gets more complex and interesting after GoT, so it's really too early for you to make the call that ASOIAF is "NOT" how strong female characters are done. I don't know if you would/will, but going by your definition, in my mind almost if not all of his female POV characters ARE strong characters.)
no subject
Edit: I admit that my original comment was a little rude and I do apologise. As for my definition of 'strong' characters, I suppose that we all have different expectations from our literature and GRRM just failed to measure up to my standards. But then again, my expectations may have just been a little too high when I started reading. I'd probably have enjoyed the book if I had discovered it before all the hype.
(*deleted comment to repost with edit*)
no subject
no subject
I still haven't gotten into the habit of reading books in digital format as easily as the regular ink-and-paper ones, unfortunately... :(
no subject
I don't have an e-reader so I haven't gotten into reading digitally either. I like to curl up in bed or the bath with my reading and unfortunately, can't really drag the desktop around with me.....
no subject
Apology accepted :)
s for my definition of 'strong' characters, I suppose that we all have different expectations from our literature and GRRM just failed to measure up to my standards. But then again, my expectations may have just been a little too high when I started reading. I'd probably have enjoyed the book if I had discovered it before all the hype.
Oh, I totally no what you mean about that -- as I said, that's basically how I felt after reading GoT (not just about female characters, even. I was like "well, that was kind of cool, but WHY does everyone love this so much."). I don't think your standards are too high at all, I just think the books get more interesting later.
I'm glad you hear you're planning to read more when you can! I actually had the same kind of thought at the end of GoT -- I took about a two week break between reading GoT and reading ACOK because I knew I was going to see a a friend who could lend ACOK to me, and didn't feel like paying for it. However, by the time I got around to book three, I bought it, because there was no way I was waiting even a day for more :)
no subject
In any case, you have all convinced me that the series does get better and that I should definitely continue reading, so thanks! ^__^
no subject
I honestly like your definition of strong, and it's how I view female characters. I would like to point out that when I said feminists I think I probably said it in a negative way that was unintentional. I identify as a feminists, but sometimes there are some parroting as feminists on LJ that actually express views that aren't feminist like at all. I don't mean to pry, but why aren't you a feminists? If you have notions that we are all man-hating, sj-warrior types, then welp...
I can definitely see where you are coming from. Most, if not all, the characters in the first book didn't come off as really different than stereotypical characters I've read before, but I think that was due to the plot needing to move forward to conflict, and then the character's reaction to that said conflict really shows more of how much depth and thought that GRRM gave to each of them. For example, Sansa. Dear god. She was written really poorly in the first book. However, I'm really surprised of her character growth over the novels.
I do agree with the anon above about misogyny. I think it does need to be addressed. Sadly though? I don't think it will get the attention it needs. :\
no subject
I understand why you would think that I was talking about the sex and I can totally see various LJ feminists (and I use the term loosely here) going on about misogyny and ‘how dare he’, while missing the larger point entirely. I agree with you that if the writer is going to set his story in a misogynist world, then I had damn well better see the misogyny, or what’s the point? The problem is, GRRM doesn’t deal with any of the issues he brings up on a meaningful (or at least interesting) level, because he is too busy playing with his imaginary little world in a way that doesn’t devote enough depth to any aspect of his story. Overall, I found his writing entertaining enough to read, but not remarkable. His brand of fantasy is nothing new and he has too many already-seen motives competing for the reader’s attention, without fully devoting himself to any of them. The same goes for the characterisation. The whole weak/strong I was going on about was about the quality of the writing, not the personality of the characters, but I totally see why you would have interpreted my original comment that way.
I do identify as a feminist, in the sense that I believe in equal rights and choices for everyone regardless of gender and sexual orientation. I believe in the right to have those choices respected. I believe in accountability for one’s actions and taking responsibility for your own life. I work hard for my education and independence and realise that I only have these options thanks to feminism, whose basic principles stand for everything that I believe in. What I meant to say up there is ‘I am not a feminist raging against misogyny in a fictional misogynist world’ in response to what you implied in your comment, because I was complaining about the author’s depth of characterisation, not his choice of characters. ^__^
On the subject of ‘feminists’ (on LJ and IRL) raging against men in general, women who choose to marry (take their husband’s surname/choose to stay home instead of working/make dinner/walk the dog/whatever the hell doesn’t measure up to their ‘feminist’ standards) and having children, I totally agree with you. These people forget that the basis of feminism is the right to make the choice about what kind of life you want to live without being judged and bashed for it, and sadly, they do not realise that by acting like this, they are undermining the very movement that they claim to stand for. I’ve noticed that the most aggressive ones among this group are usually the most privileged ones too, who have never actually had to fight for their rights, or make sacrifices in order to remain true to themselves. They usually don’t know what they are talking about and think that being loud and extreme somehow makes them special and cool. (Yes, I am bitter about this. =__=)