ext_33427 (
degrees.livejournal.com) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-06-21 04:07 pm
[ SECRET POST #167 ]
⌈ Secret Post #167 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.
2.

3.
4.
5.

6.

7.
8.
9.

10.
11.
12. [ PICTURE TOO TINY ]
13.
14.
15.

16.
17.
18.
19.

20.

21.

22.

23. [ PICTURE TOO TINY ]
24.

25.
Notes:
To whoever submitted these secrets [ 1 & 2 ] the pictures saved tiny or something. Resubmit with the secrets bigger!
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #024.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Friday, June 22nd, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: #15
(Anonymous) 2007-06-24 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)GOD! Are you people stupid?
no subject
I think everyone here is aware that spoilers are often featured in the comments. I don't mind this, I'm not so foolish as to pitch a fit about the rules. What I was commenting on was why did the secret maker see fit to spoil that when the secret could have quite easily stood without it. Spoiling for the sake of spoiling?
But much more to the point though, the secret makers primary goal seemed to be selling the games worth, and trying to attract more fans. A broad statement about the ending or whatnot is one thing, you can mention that without people saying 'hey, why would I play this game now that you've told me that?' But as someone else pointed out, the scenes with Agro are just about the only scenes in the game that can be spoiled, as to say 'I wish more people would appreciate the beauty of this game' in the same breath as 'boy was I said when Agro died' really seems to defy this goal.
And that was the nature of my "complaint". Sorry I wasn't clear the first time? Really, I understand what you're saying, and I agree with you. Complaining about spoilers on this community would be pointless as a whole. It was the spoiler in the context of this secret that threw me off, you follow?