case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2011-11-24 03:29 pm

[ SECRET POST #1787 ]

⌈ Secret Post #1787 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________

02.


__________________________________________________

03.


__________________________________________________

04.


__________________________________________________

05.


__________________________________________________

06.


__________________________________________________

07.


__________________________________________________

08.


__________________________________________________

09.


__________________________________________________

10.


__________________________________________________

11.


__________________________________________________

12.


__________________________________________________

13.


__________________________________________________

14.


__________________________________________________

15.


__________________________________________________

16.


__________________________________________________

17.


__________________________________________________

18.


__________________________________________________

19.


__________________________________________________

20.


__________________________________________________

21.


__________________________________________________

22.


__________________________________________________

23.


__________________________________________________

24.


__________________________________________________

25.


__________________________________________________

26.


__________________________________________________

27.


__________________________________________________

28.


__________________________________________________

29.


__________________________________________________

30.


__________________________________________________

31.


__________________________________________________

32.


__________________________________________________

33.


__________________________________________________

34.


__________________________________________________

35.


__________________________________________________

36.


__________________________________________________

37.


__________________________________________________

38.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #255.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

not anon(s?) who was arguing with you

(Anonymous) 2011-11-25 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
You are studying or have studied Psychology but you don't realize how offensive you've been in this thread?

I don't even disagree with your point, but the way you bring it up is very rude and condescending.

Sex is a very sensitive topic in real life already - it stands to reason that if you want a coherent, polite conversation about it on the internet you ought to show more tact and respect, which, regardless of the anonymous commenter(s)' behavior, you ought to have shown if you wanted your arguments and yourself to be taken seriously instead of triggering defensive attitudes in everyone who didn't agree with you.

You are either not taking this seriously, in which case you are acting much too similarly to a troll, or you have to apply your studies to real life situations some more.

Re: not anon(s?) who was arguing with you

[identity profile] choffman.livejournal.com 2011-11-25 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
You're spot on, I vastly misjudged how offended lj anons can get over word use.

I've had plenty of discussions around here on far more offensive topics and never had the negative reaction I'm having here, and this was pretty much my bad. Definitely not intentionally trying to troll, if I was I would have just gone anon like everyone else. ;p

And you're right about the fact that I wasn't taking this particular conversation too seriously. If I'd been writing a paper or talking to somenone I wouldn't have thrown around that term.

Re: not anon(s?) who was arguing with you

(Anonymous) 2011-11-25 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
It wasn't even your discussion what offended, or that lj anons are too sensitive; what caused that reaction was your condescension and assumption that you automatically know about the op's and the anon's problems in their sex lives just because of their personal taste in sex, whether in real life or in fiction - which, by the way, are not necessarily connected despite the impression you seem to be under; some people's taste in fiction is reflected by their taste in real life, but that's not the case with everyone, and why are you so convinced that preferring to talk during sex is wrong, anyway?

The condescension was what caused everything here.

And you're right about the fact that I wasn't taking this particular conversation too seriously. If I'd been writing a paper or talking to somenone I wouldn't have thrown around that term.

But you were talking to someone. Perhaps not face to face, but the people here are not any less real than people you meet in person.

Re: not anon(s?) who was arguing with you

(Anonymous) 2011-11-25 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
*not preferring to talk, I meant

Also, what [livejournal.com profile] oflittlebrain said below me.

Re: not anon(s?) who was arguing with you

[identity profile] oflittlebrain.livejournal.com 2011-11-25 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
I vastly misjudged how offended lj anons can get over word use.

yes of course it's just that anons are easily offended and not that you were being a giant fuckass all over this thread

"frigid" is an offensive term for female sexual arousal disorder because it has been constantly thrown at women who are not sexually available all the time in the ways that men want them to be. for you to whip that term out for absolutely no reason was just out of control.