case: ([ Devilbats; Fandom sucks. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-07-03 06:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #179 ]


⌈ Secret Post #179 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 82 secrets from Secret Submission Post #026.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 ] broken links, [ 1 2 ] not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, July 4th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2007-07-05 07:50 pm (UTC)(link)
remember that the secret in question was not offering constructive criticism and didn't even give a reason for the opinion.

?????

What?

since when is [livejournal.com profile] fandomsecrets supposed to be a critique comm? they were stating an opinion, something that some of the members of the games seem to have taken issue with, and quite rudely, too. Doesn't speak well for your game if you allow these jerks to flop around and attack anyone who doesn't like their game, for their own reasons that they don't owe you!

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-07-05 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Um, I didn't say that fandomsecrets was supposed to be a critique comm. The person I was talking to (you?) said that CFUD players never listen to a valid concern based on what was happening in this post, and I said that the two weren't comparable, because valid input =/= random flaming, and who takes random flaming seriously?

No one is attacking anyone who "doesn't like" the game, they're making fun of... hey, whaddaya know, an anonymous attack. So I guess it doesn't speak well for the poster of the secret by your logic, huh?