case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-01-15 04:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #1839 ]

⌈ Secret Post #1839 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________

02.


__________________________________________________

03.


__________________________________________________

04.


__________________________________________________

05.


__________________________________________________

06. [repeat]


__________________________________________________

07.


__________________________________________________

08.


__________________________________________________

09.


__________________________________________________

10.


__________________________________________________

11.


__________________________________________________

12.


__________________________________________________

13.


__________________________________________________

14.


__________________________________________________

15.


__________________________________________________

16.


__________________________________________________

17.


__________________________________________________

18.


__________________________________________________

19.


__________________________________________________

20.


__________________________________________________

21.


__________________________________________________

22.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 156 secrets from Secret Submission Post #263.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-01-16 04:38 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, god forbid they have a girly girl as the protagonist! The horror!

Guess what? It's not sexist to have the female character look cutesy. If EVERY female protagonist in Pokemon was unbearably feminine then maybe I could understand being tired of it, but the heroines in RSE and BW aren't girly. Even the girl from FRLG isn't all that cutesy. So we have an almost even mix of girly girls and tomboys.

You have no reason to bitch.

(Anonymous) 2012-01-16 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

The RSE girl hardly counts since she's almost as old as Crys. And even in Emerald she DOES look pretty girly, since she trades in her workout clothes for a dress.

Also, when the girls are dressed in girly ways despite the fact that it would be HIGHLY IMPRACTICAl for what they're doing in the games (Dawn, I'm talking to you) I think it is sexist.

Plus ayrt wasn't upset about the fact that the character was girly. She was upset that they REPLACED a non-girly character with a girly one. That's a bit different than just having a character who's girly.

(Anonymous) 2012-01-16 05:09 am (UTC)(link)
How did I not notice that the person you replied to wasn't anon. >_> /fail

(Anonymous) 2012-01-16 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
How does she not count just because she's almost as old as Crystal? How does that make any sense? And if we're only judging recent girls, then what about White? She's probably the sportiest protagonist yet.

And I wouldn't call her "pretty girly" in Emerald because I hardly consider that to be a dress. It barely covers her crotch. It's more like a really long shirt that she wears with shorts underneath. She's also wearing very practical shoes and gloves, and there's nothing about her "dress" that indicates it will get in the way of her adventuring.

Also, even if Lyra is girly, her outfit isn't impractical. It looks pretty damn comfortable to me. The only characters that you can say are sacrificing sense for the sake of femininity are Dawn and Leaf, and that's two out of six girls.

If it was just that, then that's one thing (even if I do think it's silly to be upset over something so minor) but she claimed that it was SEXIST for her to be replaced by a girly character, which is so not true.

[identity profile] kindlycoyote.livejournal.com 2012-01-16 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh wooooooow.

Hun, sit down and take a chill pill. One, I mentioned that I probably would not have cared nearly as much if it wasn't in conjunction with a lot of other stuff that was going on. Two, the anon who replied to you was right in saying it's different to make a girly character rather than replace a tough one with a girly one. Three?

Three is that I do like a lot of 'girly' protagonists/characters, when done well. Like Lily (How I Met Your Mother), Lola (from a book), Mara (also from a book), Glenda (from the Wicked Musical)... girlishness I find is just fine when it's a fleshed out character. Partly I feel this way because my sister is very girly, but still kicks ass and is one of the toughest and proudest people I know. Girlishness is not a problem in and of itself.

What is a problem is that in a lot of Anime, I had noticed that women who were tough were many times either replaced by or made into a girly character. Or were shown to be 'lesser' through narrative or other means than the girly character. During that time I read one Manga that flat out stated that women, no matter how tough or well-trained they were, would freeze in a crisis while a man, no matter how timid or 'weak' they were, would rise to take over the situation.

It was in the form of a inspiring monologue and everything.

This I read right before I saw the character changed, so you bet I felt annoyed as all hell. It isn't that a character is girly, but that in many cultures and in many peoples' eyes a girly girl is superior to a tomboy or any other type of woman. THIS is my issue, because no one is superior. We all rock equally. And I'm sick of people making judgement calls about how people choose to live their life.

Hell, I'm not even a tomboy or particularly tough looking myself. I like lipstick and sleek curve-hugging dresses with pimped-out high-heels. Sure, I also like to throw on cargoes and hoodies, but I would no more classify myself a tomboy as I would a diva. *shrugs*

TL'DR- You barkin' up the wrong tree.