case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-01-19 07:25 pm

[ SECRET POST #1843 ]

⌈ Secret Post #1843 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________

02.


__________________________________________________

03.


__________________________________________________

04.


__________________________________________________

05.


__________________________________________________

06. [repeat]


__________________________________________________

07.


__________________________________________________

08.


__________________________________________________

09.


__________________________________________________

10.


__________________________________________________

11.


__________________________________________________

12.


__________________________________________________

13.


__________________________________________________

14.


__________________________________________________

15.


__________________________________________________

16.


__________________________________________________

17.


__________________________________________________

18.


__________________________________________________

19.


__________________________________________________

20. [broken]


__________________________________________________

21.


__________________________________________________

22.


__________________________________________________

23.


__________________________________________________

24.


__________________________________________________

25.


__________________________________________________

26.


__________________________________________________

27.


__________________________________________________

28.


__________________________________________________

29. [broken]


__________________________________________________

30.


__________________________________________________

31.


__________________________________________________

32.


__________________________________________________

33.


__________________________________________________

34.


__________________________________________________

35.


__________________________________________________

36.


__________________________________________________

37.


__________________________________________________

38.


__________________________________________________

39.


__________________________________________________

40.


__________________________________________________

41.


__________________________________________________

42.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 50 secrets from Secret Submission Post #263.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-01-20 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
Sort of get where you're coming from - personally I ship them in a non-sexual way. I think Sherlock is asexual and John is hetrosexual, but they seem to be written like they've been falling in love.
Unfortunately, I don't think TV is progressive enough to feature a romantic non-sexual relationship :/

[identity profile] bygoshbygolly.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
I see them as romantic-but-not-sexual too! They just seem unhealthily in love, but there isn't really any sexual tension.

[identity profile] fenm.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't mind this, under two conditions: John stops dating, and John and Sherlock actually state they love each other, even if it's just when they're alone in their flat.

And really, if you think about it: Even if they were a "conventional" couple, it's not like they'd show them having sex, anyway; so to some extent, them being in a non-sexual romantic relationship would look the same to the home audience.

[identity profile] teh-faolkitty.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
Not on purpose anyway.

[identity profile] rocketgirl2.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
This 100%. I really hope they do go about portraying their relationship that way, though, because holy crap does the world ever need it.

[identity profile] etherealtsuki.livejournal.com 2012-01-20 04:41 am (UTC)(link)
Eh, if that relationship was different-sex, I would agree but most same-sex relationships are still often written as non-sexual in general and that was and still is the general problem with queer relationships in international media.

The question really is that the UK is progressive enough to have one of their most beloved icons in a same-sex relationship even said show is an alternative timeline version?

(Anonymous) 2012-01-20 04:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, like that person above me pointed out having a saqme sex romantic relationship be nonsexual isn't actually progressive, it's the norm...