ext_33427 ([identity profile] degrees.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-07-06 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #182 ]


⌈ Secret Post #182 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12. [ NOT SECRET ]

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20. [ NOT FANDOM ]

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26. [ NOT SECRET ]





Notes:

Last day to submit for next week!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #026.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 2 ] not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom/repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Saturday, July 7th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

24

[identity profile] author-by-night.livejournal.com 2007-07-07 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
Honestly, the anti-OC thing ticks me off, because it's okay for someone to write OOC H/D BDSM, and if they were sporked the sporkers would be blasted all around. But if you don't like sporking OCs, you are a silly, hyper sensitive Suehor.

(anon behind 24)

(Anonymous) 2007-07-07 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
Really.

Interesting thing about "sporking"... it started off with "using a spork to rip my eyes out", right? So, when people talk about "sporking" OCs, they're basically talking about tearing their eyes out with sporks. What the hell, people! Some perspective, please!

Re: (anon behind 24)

[identity profile] chelonianmobile.livejournal.com 2007-07-07 11:04 am (UTC)(link)
It's called a "joke", dude.

(anon behind 24)

(Anonymous) 2007-07-07 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Sure doesn't seem like it is for the people in that secret.