Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-03-17 03:12 pm
[ SECRET POST #1901 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 150 secrets from Secret Submission Post #272.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-18 02:16 am (UTC)(link)I'm not sure about this bit though:
Similarly, I identify as queer or dyke and despite the historical connotations of those terms, it's okay for me to use them, because I'm a LGBTQ person reappropriating an offensive term. It is still offensive if a straight person calls me that, unless I've personally okayed it.
I agree that no one should be calling you those things unless you're ok with it. But he wasn't 'calling' anyone the n-word. He was quoting, I suppose. I had an English lit professor who taught a class on 'Beloved'. One of the themes is slavery and the n-word is used a lot. He would quote from the text so we could discuss it. Back home in Europe, no one batted an eye. In the US when he was a guest lecturer, he had someone come and tell him this was a terrible faux pas. The only reason no students had spoken up and no one really blamed him was because they knew he was foreign. When he told us this story, we were all shocked. We knew the n-word was bad, we would never call anyone that, but it was in the text.
I think it might be something like this.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-18 02:38 am (UTC)(link)The anon I was replying to made the assumption that "he doesn't think it's appropriate to use that word, considering its historical background" and if we proceed from there, I wanted to point out that reclaimed terms do not function the same way as they do in the previous context. I apologise my poor wording. My intention was never to say that him using the n-word in the interview was racist or mean-spirited (since it can be seen as a quote). I intended to simply give another example of reclaimed words and how they work, since I know little about the reappropriation of the n-word, whereas I have personal experience with terms like queer/dyke. I simply meant that someone calling me a dyke or a queer would be offensive, just as someone calling a PoC the n-word would be offensive, while it's fine for me to refer to myself as queer/dyke and a PoC to themselves as n-word. I didn't mean that his comment should be taken as that kind of an insult.
And yes, I've also had a class on Beloved in Europe and the n-word was used in no way offensively. So I agree with you completely!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-18 09:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-03-18 01:55 pm (UTC)(link)"My intention was never to say that him using the n-word in the interview was racist or mean-spirited (since it can be seen as a quote)."
I was simply trying to explain to anon why, if we assume that he doesn't like gangsta rap because he thinks the use of the n-word is inappropriate (which is the anon's assumption and the interview doesn't have to be read that way, but I am replying to anon's assumption), that's problematic because a person who doesn't belong to a particular marginalized group isn't in the place to say whether or not it's appropriate for that group to use reclaimed slurs. Still basing on anon's assumption that he expressed his dislike because he thought it to be inappropriate, it doesn't mean he'd be racist or homophobic (which I have never once said he'd be), it just means that he doesn't have a very good understanding of reappropriated slurs. Which is fine, but it is problematic. But perhaps he didn't mean it that way at all.