[ SECRET POST #1901 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #1901 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________

02.


__________________________________________________

03.


__________________________________________________

04.


__________________________________________________

05.


__________________________________________________

06.


__________________________________________________

07.


__________________________________________________

08.


__________________________________________________

09.


__________________________________________________

10.


__________________________________________________

11.


__________________________________________________

12.


__________________________________________________

13.


__________________________________________________

14.


__________________________________________________

15.


__________________________________________________

16.


__________________________________________________

17.


__________________________________________________

18.


__________________________________________________

19.


__________________________________________________

20.


__________________________________________________

21.


__________________________________________________

22.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 150 secrets from Secret Submission Post #272.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

Comments

[sandor051.livejournal.com]

Doesn't work that way, srry, at least take some philosophy 101 or something before you feel ready to make arguments about the nature of truth - it turns out, you're not speaking some new fresh ideas, and there's already a large body of critique available to explain why this point is shit.

[insanenoodlyguy.livejournal.com]

I'll have you know I got an A in philosophy 101, sir or madam. Therefore you're argument is invalid. Also, which part of my statement is the critique proving is shit? The part where I say you can't disprove or prove religion or the part where I say it doesn't matter? Be specific. Debate club should have prepped you for this!

I get the impression you want to have a fight with me more then a fight about this. Especially since you don't seem to be fully reading my posts.

[sandor051.livejournal.com]

The point that there's a more then a trivially true difference between an unprovable truth, and an unprovable falsehood. There isn't.

Second to that would be the point that you're using truth in a colloquial manner, but in our empirical reality we have incredibly strong evidence about the nature of the claim - no we can't philosophically prove there to be no god (well some we can, but that's for another day), but that doesn't mean we're 99.9∞ sure about the answer.

Russels teapot etc. There are an infinite number of unknown truths, we shouldn't lend them any credence, one has to prove them to be of worth for them to hold worth. So to an extent you're right I guess, there is no point in arguing, but that's because the debate has been settled, you don't have a reason to believe in god - and you should change your incorrect beliefs, except this, and move on.