case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-03-17 03:12 pm

[ SECRET POST #1901 ]

⌈ Secret Post #1901 ⌋


Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________

02.


__________________________________________________

03.


__________________________________________________

04.


__________________________________________________

05.


__________________________________________________

06.


__________________________________________________

07.


__________________________________________________

08.


__________________________________________________

09.


__________________________________________________

10.


__________________________________________________

11.


__________________________________________________

12.


__________________________________________________

13.


__________________________________________________

14.


__________________________________________________

15.


__________________________________________________

16.


__________________________________________________

17.


__________________________________________________

18.


__________________________________________________

19.


__________________________________________________

20.


__________________________________________________

21.


__________________________________________________

22.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 150 secrets from Secret Submission Post #272.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ]
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] jak-frostty.livejournal.com 2012-03-19 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
True enough about the other branches, though I was only responding to the pic.

The other two posts were not ignored, but they didn't mention anything that hadn't already been covered in earlier posts. Since my metaphor was in question, I explained my point plainly in the last two paragraphs of the previous post. If someone had asked me a pointed question or to explain my reasoning better, I would have obliged.

I've apologized to the original anon for upsetting them. That was not my intent. But I will not apologize for the metaphors since by definition metaphors are imperfect comparisons used to prove a point. And I had not only noticed the imperfection but mentioned it when I first posted it.
Edited 2012-03-19 03:52 (UTC)