[ SECRET POST #1959 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #1959 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #280.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

First off, darling, it's Lestrade, with an 'e' at the end.

Second off... the implication is not Sherlock, ALL ON HIS LONESOME, faked the crimes. It is that, as John exhibited, his enigmatic personality was really the culprit and he could have well convinced others to do these crimes. Much like, (and watch carefully, this comes full-circle)... Moriarty. So the implication was not that Sherlock faked all of his cases, it was that he likely set them up to an extent (again, with the unwitting or willing help of the respectively gullible and morally dubious population) or used 'tricks' to 'solve' them. It wasn't even imperative that he faked the entire case in order to BE a 'fake'.

It was a witch-hunt all 'round, Sherlock just had it turned on him by Moriarty.

Use your imagination a bit, he either put the plan into motion when he was notified of the crime or somehow planted his clients. I mean, there are loads of explanations as to how this could have all feasibly been within the range of his reach. Faking a case can encompass so many things.

Tarnishing a reputation does not mean 'proving beyond a reasonable doubt', as they would say in the US justice system. All you have to do is INSTILL doubt in the first place to tarnish an already questionable reputation, (which Sherlock had at best).

But aside from all the reasons it could make sense, there are some holes and just either A) assume a margin for human error/lack of logic, B) sit back and enjoy, it's a television show, quite down to earth for the same man who does Dr. Who. Clearly, I try to do B, but A always trips me up.

I do always enjoy a healthy dose of skepticism but do think about the possibilities presented here, a bit deeper than what seems to be so obvious.