[ SECRET POST #1961 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #1961 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #280.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[kelincihutan.livejournal.com]

Actually, I do this too. I also get much less of a charge from reviews that are full of misspellings/punctuated wrongly/capitalized wrongly/written with unironic chatspeak/written with bad syntax that does not suggest an ESL author/etc. I'm hardly going to say any of this to the reviewer, 'cause that would be very rude, and it's nice to be reviewed whatever the content, but I appreciate the ones where the writer is someone who, ostensibly, has a basic grasp of writing fundamentals.