case: ([ L; Maybe. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-07-17 05:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #193 ]


⌈ Secret Post #193 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.




Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 079 secrets from Secret Submission Post #027.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 2 ] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 ] too big.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, July 18th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-07-17 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm actually not seeing any "anyone that agrees is an idiot" in the original anon comment, just someone expressing frustration at an oversimplification of something that is very important to them. But then again, not everyone perceives internet sentences the same way ~:o~

Anyway, the original secret was sort of smug in its "lol, serial killer with a notebook = God, but better; booo religion" tone, which I found infinitely more grating than the anon's ATTITUDE!!!1 problem, which yeah, was there. So most "iawtc"s I would assume are agreeing with the sentiment as well as what is explicitly stated, because... otherwise why would people agree with it amirite.

So no, I don't think it's a big difference ):