case: ([ L; Maybe. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-07-17 05:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #193 ]


⌈ Secret Post #193 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.




Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 079 secrets from Secret Submission Post #027.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 2 ] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 ] too big.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, July 18th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] moebot.livejournal.com 2007-07-18 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Many people have studied the bible their entire lives and there still is no universal consensus on what many passages mean. I mean, I've seen some incredibly convincing evidence that there are some passages in the bible that are actually quite pro-gay. Then again, it's all interpretation. How you read into things. Yeah, some of the ideas are incredibly dated, but that's only if you take it literally and don't treat it like it was actually written by a few dudes, not god.

But ~whatevs~ you've cleared yourself up. Sorry for taking what you said the wrong way. Because yeah, I really thought you were saying something else there.
ext_197528: (Fai-Gay and sparkly)

[identity profile] kurenai-tenka.livejournal.com 2007-07-18 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
Aha~ Yeah that's what I was prattling on about in a comment below. The amount of times it's been copied back out and translated...someone could easily add something in. And right back to the beginning with the original copies, as you say, it wasn't like it was 'god' or similar who wrote it. Getting me thinking, actually. ^^;


No problem, I'm just glad it got sorted out. ^_^