Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-06-17 03:47 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #1993 ]
⌈ Secret Post #1993 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 118 secrets from Secret Submission Post #285.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-17 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
Google stats updated from yesterday!
http://i.imgur.com/cYmXi.png
Re: Google stats updated from yesterday!
(Anonymous) 2012-06-17 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
mini-cthulhuscuttlefish and squid. Highly intelligent, colourful and also very interesting, they are sadly more often than not regarded as mostly good for calamari rings. As with everything, there's a relevant xkcd for them.They're very squiddy. Also, spider warning.
source
source
Bobtail Squid (wiki)
source
source
source
source
Pfeffer's Flamboyant Cuttlefish (wiki)
source
source
Bigfin reef squid (wiki)
source
source
Slender Inshore Squid (wiki)
source
source
And lastly...
Meet the Eresus spider genus! They're from the family of velvet spiders and more commonly known as Ladybird spiders. I think it should be pretty obvious why.
source
source
source
source
Re: They're very squiddy. Also, spider warning.
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-17 20:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-18 02:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: They're very squiddy. Also, spider warning.
Re: They're very squiddy. Also, spider warning.
Re: They're very squiddy. Also, spider warning.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Re: They're very squiddy. Also, spider warning.
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-18 00:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: They're very squiddy. Also, spider warning.
Re: They're very squiddy. Also, spider warning.
Re: They're very squiddy. Also, spider warning.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-18 12:38 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-18 02:52 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(no subject)
Question regarding "The Legend of Korra"
(Anonymous) 2012-06-17 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question regarding "The Legend of Korra"
(Anonymous) 2012-06-17 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question regarding "The Legend of Korra"
Re: Question regarding "The Legend of Korra"
(Anonymous) 2012-06-17 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question regarding "The Legend of Korra"
Once I saw one episode of it on TV (The King of Omashu, for anyone wondering) and thought it was terribly kiddie and not very interesting. I passed up on the show for another year. My loss.
When I was finally convinced to do a proper watchthrough, it took me most of season 1 to really get interested, and it wasn't until somewhere in season 2 that I had to admit to myself I completely loved it and was hooked. Since then my love for it has only grown. (It isn't that the early eps are bad, I love them too now. It's just that I didn't have enough context to really get where it was going and I wasn't attached to the characters yet.)
It's an amazing show, but it starts off seeming a bit kiddie and dumb. You really just have to give it a chance, watch it in order, let the context build.
Korra could theoretically be watched without the original series, but I think it will mean more to you and resonate better if you've watched all of the original show. I seriously doubt you will regret it.
Re: Question regarding "The Legend of Korra"
I think in general you'd have more appreciation for it if you had the background - the mythology, worldbuilding, etc. from ATLA really make the LOK story richer imo. But it isn't a necessity.
V-Dex project?
(Anonymous) 2012-06-17 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)I was personally more interested in Pokefarm, until I found out about the asshole admin.
Re: V-Dex project?
(Anonymous) 2012-06-17 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)stole fromwas based on)Re: V-Dex project?
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-17 23:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: V-Dex project?
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-18 01:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: V-Dex project?
(Anonymous) 2012-06-18 12:41 am (UTC)(link)Re: V-Dex project?
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-18 02:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-17 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)Sad anon is sad, because those bastards of Nick hadn't even established a release date for her country, and everyone else is having a squeefest in fandom but her, who's struggling with avoiding spoilers. ;_;
Dammit Nickelodeon!!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-06-17 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)...Unless that's a thing that is actively being monitored and prosecuted in your country, in which case, disregard what I said in the paragraph above. >_>
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-17 22:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-17 22:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-06-17 22:25 (UTC) - Expandquestion for case
(Anonymous) 2012-06-18 02:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: question for case
Re: question for case