case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-06-29 06:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #2005 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2005 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06. [nf]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. http://i.imgur.com/H1X1Z.gif
[linked because uh not sure if this is porn or not; live action]


__________________________________________________



09. http://i.imgur.com/pNcu1.jpg
[porn of the drawn variety - Tintin]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________












[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]











11. [SPOILER WARNING for Hourou Musuko]



__________________________________________________



12. [SPOILER WARNING for Prometheus]



__________________________________________________



13. [SPOILER WARNING for Homestuck]



__________________________________________________



14. [SPOILER WARNING for Avengers]



__________________________________________________



15. [SPOILER WARNING for Merlin]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILER WARNING for Tangled]



__________________________________________________













[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]












17. [WARNING for ... pretty sure this has something to do with rape]



__________________________________________________



18. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #286.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-06-30 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)
As visp said, none of us was diagnosing the OP of this secret with anything. We were just pointing out an alternative interpretation to a commenter who basically said, "Wow, you must have had a really cushy childhood with ideal parents, since you don't recognize abuse when you see it."

"Why would anyone spot that behavior who's not familiar with the topic?" I think a person who had a happy childhood with a basically healthy, loving relationship with their parents, or a person who has experienced emotional abuse but got away from the abuser, are almost equally likely to see Gothel's behavior as unhealthy, creepily possessive, selfish and abusive. If you've experienced abuse and you have gained perspective about it by getting away from it, you'll recognize it. If you had a healthy, non-abusive, non-manipulative relationship with your parents, you'll recognize its opposite. But if you had an emotionally abusive parent and don't realize it, then your only model for a good parent-child relationship is the one you were told was good. You lack a perspective from which to judge.
world_eater: (Default)

[personal profile] world_eater 2012-06-30 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh, that's basically what I was calling armchair psychology though, I might not have used the proper word? What you're saying seems such a simplistic look at it.
See, what's bugging me so much about that logic is that I don't have an abusive mother and I never would've classified Gothel as abusive (or noticed the whole nickname, hair-touching, undermining confidence thing. I thought she was just wacky, because Disney villains usually are) and I would guess that it is simply because I'm bad at picking up such things. I refuse to believe I'm the only one who was totally blown away when people commented on that.

(Anonymous) 2012-06-30 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Wait, you thought Gothel was "just wacky" and you're calling anybody's analysis simplistic? Does not compute.
world_eater: (Default)

[personal profile] world_eater 2012-06-30 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Not the analysis of Gothel, the analysis of the people who do not perceive her as abusive.

[Edit]
And before that's up for misinterpretation too: I meant the analyising that people here do of those that do not...and so on.
Edited 2012-06-30 21:57 (UTC)