case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-06-30 03:24 pm

[ SECRET POST #2006 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2006 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 135 secrets from Secret Submission Post #287.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2012-07-01 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
But is it good concrit? Because if you're just trying to get a rise out of them, then it's not a surprise when you get a rise out of them. Basing someone's actions where you have set them up to fail is a terrible measuring stick. It doesn't really guarantee that the people who fail aren't mature. That's like throwing a ball through someone's window and then judging them if they react angrily.

If it's legit crit, then why not write it under you're real account? Do you just not want to get spam from their followers or something? Otherwise, it seems silly that you are criticizing other people for not being about to react maturely to criticism, but you find yourself unwilling to get any real criticism against your "real" account. I assume it's that you don't want crazy lackeys to attack you everywhere you go, but that's giving you the benefit of the doubt.
Edited 2012-07-01 03:02 (UTC)