case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-07-01 03:19 pm

[ SECRET POST #2007 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2007 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 111 secrets from Secret Submission Post #287.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - text secret ], [ 1 - empty image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
fadeinthewash: vintagead-rangeman (Default)

[personal profile] fadeinthewash 2012-07-02 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess I'm just looking at it as an incredibly basic test...that also is pretty meaningless for any one script. It'd be better than nothing, I suppose, but I don't think it'd really be that useful in the long run. We'd just quickly hit another plateau of women having short conversations (potentially still petty and/or sexist) and then right back to manapalooza (either by focusing on those male characters or by having every other conversation be about men). Which I guess brings us back to "still better than nothing" but *shrug*.
brooms: (Default)

[personal profile] brooms 2012-07-02 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
that also is pretty meaningless for any one script.

i think it's kind of obvious by now i'm not thinking in terms of any one script.

i'm more optimistic than you because a lot of movies just can't afford to waste time on this - brodeoactionbrodeoactionbrodeoaction random scene of nameless women the audience doesn't care about talking about things the audience doesn't care about and are useless to the overall story and characters brodeoactionbrodeoaction.

the clock can tick very fast when you have to wrap everything up in just over 2 hours.

and it would basically mean writers would have to get in more than one woman with a speaking role. i'm pretty cynical, but not enough to believe every script writer would take this as an invitation to be petty and write a 10 seconds scene of the leading lady buying tampons and discussing the weather with the female cashier.

anyway, it will never happen! all will continue as is. yay.