case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-07-16 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2022 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2022 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #289.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
tenebrais: (Default)

[personal profile] tenebrais 2012-07-17 03:05 pm (UTC)(link)
If someone swipes those same Harry Potter DVDs from the manufacturer, have they still stolen it? The cost to said manufacturer is negligible. If the thief leaves behind a few pennies as compensation, is it still stolen, or has it now been bought? The manufacturer has lost out on nothing at this point, yet someone ended up with a DVD for virtually free, and certainly far less than the asking price.

If I write an album, and find myself unable to sell it because everyone that might want it already has a copy they didn't pay for, has anyone wronged me? No one individually did any harm to me, and yet I've put in a lot of work for no gain besides some ephemeral popularity. This is an extreme example but it's the main motivator for opposing piracy, especially among smaller artists that can't tank the costs of lost sales.