[ SECRET POST #2022 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2022 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #289.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Wait, what? You talked about the durability of games (DVDs) and books and insurance. I replied about the durability of books, DVDs and insurance. What does reselling books and games have to do with our conversation?

For the record, I do not think it is not okay to resell games.

[ariakas]

Yes, but your argument that it is okay to resell books because they are less expensive and less durable than games is completely negated by the fact that - unless you believe used car sales are wrong, and you'd be the first person I've ever met - it is entirely socially acceptable, with no debate, to resell your car. Cars are much, much more durable and expensive than games.

So yeah, that argument doesn't really hold water in light of what is and is not generally considered "okay" to resell.

[(Anonymous)]

When did I ever argue that it is okay to resell books? And when did I say it is not okay to resell games?

Let me repeat what I said earlier.

You talked about the durability of games (DVDs) and books and insurance. I replied about the durability of books, DVDs and insurance. What does reselling books and games have to do with our conversation?

[ariakas]

But the reason we are talking about the durability of books versus games is in the context of why it is generally considered socially acceptable to resell books, but not games.

If you didn't want to carry on that conversation, but just wanted to point out that books are less durable than games for absolutely no other reason than to point out that books are less durable than games, but that it has no bearing on the conversation at hand about reselling whatsoever, then...

...Okay, bizarre interjection taken.

[(Anonymous)]

So no one should take comments at face value and everyone need to read posts more than one parent away to reply in the correct context? Thank you for teaching me conversational tangents don't exist, master.

[ariakas]

...Because without that context, I never would have brought up their respective durability at all, so yes. Following the context conversation is a worthwhile and important skill, especially if you're going to be invested enough in the outcome to respond a week later, and get butthurt enough about it to make snide, passive-aggressive comments.

A thought, for future.

[(Anonymous)]

Whatever you say, master. Four days doesn't make a week though. You should count better.