case: ([ Akaba; Nothing more to say. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-07-28 05:18 pm

[ SECRET POST #204 ]


⌈ Secret Post #204 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16. [ Not a secret. ]

17.

18.

19.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 132 secrets from Secret Submission Post #030.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 2 ] not!secrets, [ 1 ] not!fandom/too big, [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Sunday, July 29th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, NS, and NF

(Anonymous) 2007-07-29 07:15 am (UTC)(link)
5. Most of these secrets do not include that clause where other conversation/interaction induces said love. Most of them say they fell in love through Role Play. Falling in love with the illusion, the fantasy, that's stupid.

I'm amused by how everyone is quick to jump forward and defend this. Methinks some people doth protest too much.

Re: 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, NS, and NF

[identity profile] repeatvoffender.livejournal.com 2007-07-29 09:20 am (UTC)(link)
On that matter I have to agree with you. Falling in love with someone's fictional character, when it's just a game is pretty stupid, they are not their character. My point being that there is a difference, and falling in love with a fellow RPer is not falling in love with said RPer's character.

I'm amused by how arrogant you seem to enjoy being.

Re: 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, NS, and NF

(Anonymous) 2007-07-29 11:03 am (UTC)(link)
not the above anonymous

the problem being is that a lot of people can't seem to make the distinction between the two. that's where it gets flaky.

Re: 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, NS, and NF

[identity profile] repeatvoffender.livejournal.com 2007-07-29 11:11 am (UTC)(link)
I get that. I even said so, "On that matter I have to agree with you. Falling in love with someone's fictional character, when it's just a game is pretty stupid, they are not their character."

Re: 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, NS, and NF

(Anonymous) 2007-07-29 11:13 am (UTC)(link)
that's because I fail at reading comprehension. sorry.

Re: 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, NS, and NF

[identity profile] repeatvoffender.livejournal.com 2007-07-29 11:15 am (UTC)(link)
Don't worry about it.

Re: 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, NS, and NF

(Anonymous) 2007-07-29 11:16 am (UTC)(link)
can I claim lack of caffeine first thing in the morning as an excuse?

Re: 4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, NS, and NF

(Anonymous) 2007-07-29 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Lots of people do not bother to distinguish. Folly of youth or something like that. If I seem arrogant about it, I am. Not falling for such a common trap tends to give one some feeling of superiority. So what?