case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-08-09 06:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #2046 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2046 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #292.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - spam secret ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-08-10 09:11 am (UTC)(link)
The pool of published scholars working on this topic right now is very small and rather dated. I'm thinking of McHarry and Pagliassotti in particular, or some of the work done by Kinsella, but as I say it's all rather dated and not engaging much with anything more sophisticated.

You need to read some better writers on this topic because there's just a whole lot of not-smart going on there.
opal_skies: (Default)

[personal profile] opal_skies 2012-08-10 05:31 pm (UTC)(link)
To be honest, I haven't actually read any of it, because I thought as a general statement about all yaoi fans it seemed pretty stupid (not that there's any reason there couldn't be some instances of gay transmen enjoying the genre for vicarious pleasure, etc.), but I'd remembered seeing it mentioned in other academic books and bibliographies dealing with other topics.

(Anonymous) 2012-08-10 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Generally speaking it's just a very badly handled topic and I'm hoping in the future there will be scholars who make less disparaging arguments about fans of yaoi and that the enjoyment of it as a genre is not seen as 'vicarious pleasure,' which as a suggestion is kind of troubling and pretty insulting to the experience of gay transmen.
opal_skies: (pic#3840159)

[personal profile] opal_skies 2012-08-10 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, yes. I find it annoying as a presentation of the "ah-ha!" reason or explanation for "why" particular people might like yaoi - something that, to my knowledge, doesn't appear to be as great an area of interest when dealing with heterosexual pornography or erotic materials. But I don't know...I think for people of any gender or sexual persuasion (except, I suppose, for some asexuals), when dealing with personal enjoyment of [to a lesser extent, perhaps] romantic and/or sexual media, it isn't such a stretch to say that a lot of the enjoyment involved could be vicarious. I suppose this speaks mostly to the throngs of self-inserts across many fandoms, but particularly in, let's say, the Twilight fandom.
Again, though, I won't say this is the end-all way to interact with yaoi or other media dealing heavily with sex (I realize Twilight does not exactly fit into that category, but it was the first thing that came into my head :P). I mean, heck, I liked yaoi when I was younger (I still enjoy slash, and some malexmale comics/manga/whatever, but the endless repetition of the abusive relationship as an idealized trope of the genre wore very thin indeed for me), but I'm a non-heterosexual female, so where does that leave me? I've seen mention of some discussion of lesbian yaoi fans enjoying yaoi's androgynous characters almost as if the characters were in fact female instead, but I don't know.

Blahblahblah etc. Anyway. :P