Someone wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets 2012-08-17 11:47 pm (UTC)

Ah. The famed curseangel. Ho boy.

Just because it's not totally and irrefutably contradicted by canon, doesn't mean it has even a smidgen of actual support. It's still just wild "what if?" theories. If it was meant to be canon, there would've been a mention in the movie that made it canon. This isn't a documentary of real-life events.

Unless Marvel decides that it's a good idea to completely screw over the plot of a highly popular movie by revealing it's villain to be an exploited little flunkie who didn't mean it, and does a retcon in Thor 2 or something, it's not what happened.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting