Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2012-08-17 06:28 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2012-08-17 06:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #2054 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2054 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
__________________________________________________
13.
__________________________________________________
14.
__________________________________________________
15.
__________________________________________________
16.
__________________________________________________
17.
__________________________________________________
18.
__________________________________________________
19.
__________________________________________________
20.
__________________________________________________
21.
__________________________________________________
22.
__________________________________________________
23.
[Tracy Beaker Returns/The Dumping Ground]
__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
23. [SPOILERS for Usagi Drop]
__________________________________________________
24. [SPOILERS for Legend of Korra]
__________________________________________________
25. [SPOILERS for XXXholic]
__________________________________________________
26. [SPOILERS for Revenge]
__________________________________________________
[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
27. [WARNING for abuse and rape]
__________________________________________________
28. [WARNING for rape]
__________________________________________________
29. [WARNING for rape]
__________________________________________________
30. [WARNING for rape]
__________________________________________________
31. [WARNING for rape]
[American Horror Story]
__________________________________________________
32. [WARNING for rape]
[Sons of Anarchy]
__________________________________________________
33. [WARNING for child abuse]
[08th MS Team]
__________________________________________________
34. [WARNING for suicide]
__________________________________________________
35. [WARNING for gore, animal abuse]
[American Psycho]
__________________________________________________
36. [WARNING for incest]
[Chrono Crusade]
__________________________________________________
37. [WARNING for underage]
__________________________________________________
38. [WARNING for bullying/abuse]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #293.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-17 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)Just because it's not totally and irrefutably contradicted by canon, doesn't mean it has even a smidgen of actual support. It's still just wild "what if?" theories. If it was meant to be canon, there would've been a mention in the movie that made it canon. This isn't a documentary of real-life events.
Unless Marvel decides that it's a good idea to completely screw over the plot of a highly popular movie by revealing it's villain to be an exploited little flunkie who didn't mean it, and does a retcon in Thor 2 or something, it's not what happened.
no subject
Anyway, I figure that if that theory is true, the reason they didn't mention it is because it will be brought up in greater depth and actually dealt with in Thor 2, when they'll have time to properly work it out. But yeah, as you said, it's just a theory at this point. The problem with such a vast and complex 'verse as MCU, I suspect, is that we're going to have to wait until more of the individual character films, and possibly even until Avengers 2, to work through all of the little details and issues that weren't able to be fully and thoroughly addressed in Avengers.
I don't think it would be as simplistic or "ruin" anything if they went that route, personally. I think it would add considerable depth to what I felt was mostly a phoned in appearance -- Loki in Avengers, at face value, lacked ALL of the depth and complexity that made his appearance in Thor so memorable. He was a cardboard cut-out villain, evil for the sake of being evil. If it turns out, come Thor 2, that that really is all there was to it, I'll be sorely disappointed in their apparent inability to write an ensemble Avengers movie without resorting to turning a three-dimensional, complex, deep villain into a two-dimensional Disney villain who lacks completely in motivation, skill and sympathy.
We're all allowed to have whatever opinions we want, of course. But for me, Loki's appearance in Avengers was the lowest point in the movie, and I'll be kind of pissed if it turns out that was sincerely what they intended with the character.
no subject