fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2061 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2061 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

[Xena: Warrior Princess]

__________________________________________________

02.

[tales of symphonia]

__________________________________________________

03.

[The Girl From Tomorrow]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Spyro the Dragon]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Lamento -Beyond the Void-]

__________________________________________________

06.

[Aidan Gillen]

__________________________________________________

07.

[Skyrim]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Touhou Project]

__________________________________________________

09.

[Total Recall]

__________________________________________________

10.

[Castle]

__________________________________________________

11.

[Spyro the Dragon]

__________________________________________________

[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

12. [SPOILERS for the Dark Knight Rises]

__________________________________________________

13. [SPOILERS for Digimon 02]

__________________________________________________

14. [SPOILERS for the Borgias]

__________________________________________________

15. [SPOILERS for Tales of Symphonia]

__________________________________________________

16. [SPOILERS for asoiaf/game of thrones]

__________________________________________________

17. [SPOILERS for A Dance With Dragons]

__________________________________________________

[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

18. [WARNING for eating disorders]

__________________________________________________

19. [WARNING for pedophilia, rape, child abuse]

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #294.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

my goodness you do take everything at face value don't you

your comments above make more sense now

If you mean I'm logical and don't like the idea of turning something into a crime before anybody has even been harmed or any actual action has been taken, then yes

Except people have been harmed by it. You just don't give a shit about that part because it's not conducive to "winning" arguments on F!S.

Are you conceding that I did win this argument? Because... I did.

And what are you advocating, exactly? What you're suggesting creates a dangerous precedent. There are now certain things that people aren't and are allowed to write about, to draw, to create. I could make the argument that we don't need depictions of rape in comics or porn or in novels or whatever, because people who have been raped might read that and be triggered by it. Maybe someone might even send it to a rape victim with the express purpose of causing them emotional harm.

Basically, I'm against censorship in any form. Actual child pornography is easy to be opposed to because it's impossible to create WITHOUT harming a child. By your own admission, shota/loli only has the POTENTIAL to be used in a harmful way against children.

No, I didn't. Because you didn't. Notice the quotes around "winning." It's called sarcasm. But this is you, and being a pedantic shithead is kind of your M.O. by now, so I shouldn't be surprised.

The part you're ignoring is that this crap HAS BEEN USED TO HURT PEOPLE. How the fuck do you breathe with your head stuck that far up your ass?

You sound so annoying Jesus fuck I feel sorry for anyone who has to live with you

Just give me some statistics proving that shota/loli is used MAINLY to groom children, you sound like an urban legend here

Oh wait, you won't, because ad hominem is fun and easy

When your argument is "I'm right because I said so" and too drunk to say much else, there's no point in wasting effort on anything but ad hominem since you won't listen to reason anyway. By the way, you're late with the "I'm older than all of you so that means I win" argument, and that's a little disappointing.

I'm right because there's no way to establish that shota/loli is used primarily to hurt children. Still waiting for you to prove that, since you're the one (or was it another anon, who knows) who made that argument. See, that's how debate works, you can't just make a baseless statement and keep making it without any facts or anything to back it up. The burden is on you to back up your statement with facts, and you haven't (as others in this thread have pointed out)

I'm not the only person in this thread who disagrees with you, btw, I'm just the only person with the username "childings" which apparently gets your panties in a wad

It's still "I'm right because I said so," no matter what fancy language you try to couch it in. And it's still a hilarious bullshit argument.

"Other people disagree with you!" isn't going top make it any less bullshit, either.

right back at you

oh, so if only, say, 5% of it is used to groom, 25% to fap, and the others read it "for the plot" it's suddenly okay?

really?

lol, this. Good lord what a cuntbag.

Honestly I don't see what's really wrong with someone fapping to it, it's not hurting anyone else, they aren't actually hurting a real child, why is this a problem? If anything it's good because it prevents a pedophile from acting out these desires on a real child. I mean, pedophiles can't be cured, this has been proven, they have high rates of recidivism. It's not like people CHOOSE to be pedophiles

http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletters/Harvard_Mental_Health_Letter/2010/July/pessimism-about-pedophilia
"Like other sexual orientations, pedophilia is unlikely to change. The goal of treatment, therefore, is to prevent someone from acting on pedophile urges — either by decreasing sexual arousal around children or increasing the ability to manage that arousal."

Yeah, no.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope#As_a_fallacy

What were you saying about logic?

You must not follow many Supreme Court cases

You must not, either. At least while sober enough to understand anything.

Do you know what the term "establishing a precedent" even means?

People like you are why this community is unbearable while sober

Yes, I do. You obviously don't.

So uh, what about me being the victim of child abuse here? Are people just going to ignore that one and continue to advocate for thought crime?

So am I. Your point?

[ SECRET POST #2061 ]

(frozen comment) no subject

(frozen comment) no subject

(frozen comment) no subject

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse

(frozen comment) Re: tw for child abuse