Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-07 07:01 pm
[ SECRET POST #2075 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2075 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

[Twilight]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Christian Bale, Scott Disik]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
10. [SPOILERS for Misfits]

__________________________________________________
11. [SPOILERS for A Song of Ice and Fire]

__________________________________________________
12. [SPOILERS for the Vampire Diaries]

__________________________________________________
[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
13. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
14. [WARNING for suicide]

[Truffaldino from Bergamo (1976)]
__________________________________________________
15. [WARNING for pedophilia, rape]

[DC Comics]
__________________________________________________
16. [WARNING for depression]

[Zac Little/AngryFilmsProduction (YouTube)]
__________________________________________________
17. [WARNING for child abuse]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #296.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-08 04:34 am (UTC)(link)When evidence is inconclusive, I neither believe nor disbelieve (and if it's something I care about, I continue looking for more evidence). If evidence leans one way, my belief is some variation on "probably X, but maybe Y." In fact, the vast majority of my beliefs fall into that latter category to varying degrees of "probably" and "maybe," because there's always the chance of new evidence arising or that I've misunderstood the evidence I do have.
I'm a bit confused by your implication that arriving at one of multiple options means a choice is necessarily made. "Choice" to me implies an act of volition, a conscious decision. Is that not what "choice" means to you?
no subject
That right there is what most people do, I think. Their beliefs are fluid based on what they've learned most recently. They either give one of many possibilities primacy, hold all possibilities in equal favor without committing to any one, or rejecting them all until conclusive evidence is provided. Or all of the above depending on the day of the week.
I would say the choosing lies in what possibilities they want to acknowledge at all. When evidence is inconclusive or unavailable, they believe or disbelieve the various options, they don't, as you seem to, withhold final judgment until further information can be provided.
Which I suspect is where your confusion is coming from? When conclusive evidence is not available, you therefore don't conclude - it's not a choice for you because there's nothing to choose, either something is proven or it isn't. Whereas others may not wait for conclusive evidence, they make their own conclusions without any additional information other than "This is what I want to be true." Does that make sense?