Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-08 03:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #2076 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2076 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 5 pages, 108 secrets from Secret Submission Post #297.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 4 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
though i'm curious as to how one might actually measure this. proportion of negative responses from first 10% of commenters compared to the proportion of negative responses from rest of thread? comparison of number of times someone is accused of being a troll in the first 10% of commenters compared to the rest of the thread? would we have to discount the obvious troll secrets as outliers? how does one qualify a comment as being negative?
so many questions for this hypothetical study