Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2012-09-12 07:00 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2012-09-12 07:00 pm
[ SECRET POST #2080 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2080 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
__________________________________________________
13.
__________________________________________________
14.
__________________________________________________
15.
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #297.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 4 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-13 05:48 am (UTC)(link)You're right - there's not. But if you can concede that there's no way to know what she meant, why would you jump to the worst assumption on what she meant and call her an asshole for it?
I went back and read it again. Her secret reads: "I have not and will never ever believe anybody on the internet who says they have autism." Not "I have not and will never ever believe anybody on the internet has autism." Conceding your point that there's no way to prove what the OP meant, her phrasing (though slightly awkward) is highly indicative that she simply meant she didn't believe anyone who said they were autistic was actually autistic. Especially when the only time they claim autism is when they're being called out for unacceptable behavior.
But I'm sorry, I know I'm just splitting hairs at this point. I appreciate you expanding on what you thought in such a reasonable manner.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-13 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)Because it's so much more satisfying to get offended and feel morally superior than to admit the other side may have a good reason to feel the way they do.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-09-13 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)