how can you be a fan in a fandom and never have seen or read the canon?
wikipedia is not a reliable source. recced fics and essays are biased with a slant from the individual and is scary considering how much horrible fanon I've seen perpetuated in fandoms such as Gundam Wing by writers who couldn't be buggered to watch the show.
honestly the best way to get a grasp of the characters is to watch it yourself and not get caught in the fanon trap that so often accompanies getting your information third hand. I sure hope you aren't in my fandoms. not watching or reading the canon material and getting your characterizations from fanfiction is unbelieveably and grossly irresponsible.
please don't pull the 'but everyone loves my interpretation' because I've seen fanon versions of characters beloved in fandoms which bore no resemblance to the show at all.
Re: 22.
wikipedia is not a reliable source. recced fics and essays are biased with a slant from the individual and is scary considering how much horrible fanon I've seen perpetuated in fandoms such as Gundam Wing by writers who couldn't be buggered to watch the show.
honestly the best way to get a grasp of the characters is to watch it yourself and not get caught in the fanon trap that so often accompanies getting your information third hand. I sure hope you aren't in my fandoms. not watching or reading the canon material and getting your characterizations from fanfiction is unbelieveably and grossly irresponsible.
please don't pull the 'but everyone loves my interpretation' because I've seen fanon versions of characters beloved in fandoms which bore no resemblance to the show at all.
you fail. hugely.