Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-09-25 06:56 pm
[ SECRET POST #2093 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2093 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #299.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - ships it ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

CGI Does not Age Well
So, citizens of F!S, the original Jimmy Neutron pilot;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFCVpy8Mh0Y
I wonder what year this was, because even Toy Story doesn't look this dated.
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7uazcn2y1w
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
(Anonymous) 2012-09-26 12:35 am (UTC)(link)Re: CGI Does not Age Well
That being said that's one of the many reasons why I prefer traditional animation (although sometimes that can look dated, too, and current CGI is getting much better).
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)Specifically, this and Reboot look primitive these days, yikes.
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CGI Does not Age Well
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)Great show, but the CGI looks pretty terrible from our current vantage point.
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
If not, my younger mind must have been easily impressed.
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
(Anonymous) 2012-09-25 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: CGI Does not Age Well
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
Man, Jimmy Neutron did not age well at all. Then again, what did? I remember I loved Storm Hawks when it was running, but... I don't think I would look upon it too kindly sans nostalgia goggles.
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmfKRCqyyjo
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
Re: CGI Does not Age Well
(Anonymous) 2012-09-26 01:27 pm (UTC)(link)I'm not sure if it's nostalgia glasses but I've seen Starship Troopers: Roughnecks recently and I think it still looks pretty good. At least the bugs do.