case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-09-26 06:45 pm

[ SECRET POST #2094 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2094 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #299.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - ships it ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
forgottenjester: (Default)

Re: FandomHatesWomen Speculation

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2012-09-27 04:55 am (UTC)(link)
They only deleted the one that they accused people of editing away the evidence.

Since then they'll post one or two and then wait a while. Then they resurface again. It's weird. It's like they get bored with us periodically.

Re: FandomHatesWomen Speculation

[personal profile] anonymouslyyours 2012-09-27 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
Or trying to lure F!S into a sense of security?

IDK I haven't been keeping up since the original kerfluffle where they called out biohazardgirl for literally nothing and I was basically "What? What! WHAT?!?"ing everywhere.

But four seems so perfect. Of course they have a taste for twisting more abstract comments?

I know about the editing one because I got involved in that one but I thought they also retracted a wank about Cassandra Clare?
Edited 2012-09-27 05:04 (UTC)
forgottenjester: (Default)

Re: FandomHatesWomen Speculation

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2012-09-27 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
*shrug* Maybe. I don't think they're smart or dedicated enough for that.

I admit, four is pretty perfect.

Oh yeah, because they were called out but they really half-assed their "apology". They only took it down because they were caught.

Re: FandomHatesWomen Speculation

[personal profile] anonymouslyyours 2012-09-27 05:07 am (UTC)(link)
Nm, it's late and for some reason I had thought the paraphrasing links one was different than the Cassandra Clare one.
forgottenjester: (Default)

Re: FandomHatesWomen Speculation

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2012-09-27 05:09 am (UTC)(link)
I thought they were too so... we're both tired!

Hey, since I'm sexist now I'm just gonna blame it on my vagina.
Edited 2012-09-27 05:09 (UTC)
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

Re: FandomHatesWomen Speculation

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2012-09-27 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm gonna ninja stealth that into conversation some time.

Just go "OH YEAH? YOU HATE YOUR VAGINA!"

Shit will be so cash.