case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-10-07 03:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #2105 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2105 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 107 secrets from Secret Submission Post #301.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-07 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
There's nothing sexist about liking an usually sexist trope played out by a couple of the same sex (or reverse roles) because it loses a lot of why such a trope is problematic in the first place.

A Beauty/Beast dichotomy between a same sex couple/pairing is not going have the same issues. What makes Beauty and the Beast trope sexist is that there is an expectation of girls should stick to their guy who makes how he looks and/or acts because there is a reward for them if they persevere and getting caught up in looks is very superficial. Especially when the fairytale was written for girls to make them accept their lot in life with the man her family chose for her with no complaints.

Nevermind that this will never apply to men because men are caught to aim above their station when it comes to women (and the numerous amount of male-orientated media where the less-attractive guy always get the beautiful girl reinforces that), while women are that they shouldn't be so picky and lower their expectations (and are often awarded with true love in media doing so).

But a Beauty and the Beast between same sex erases a lot of that, even if the writer shoehorns heteronormativity into it, it won't be as bad as if it was with Female Beauty and the Male Beast (and that heteronormativity is something you can avoid as well).

I discovered myself that I like a few originally problematic tropes when it's gender role switched or same sex for that reason. There's nothing sexist about flipping a normally sexist trope on its head.

(Anonymous) 2012-10-07 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
All of this!