[ SECRET POST #219 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #219 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 103 secrets from Secret Submission Post #032.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Monday, August 12th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

Legally you are correct, though only in the States (which is, admittedly, what 6A must adhere to). However, porn involving children = child porn, and there's not really a lot of arguing against that.

[(Anonymous)]

And the next step in the devolution of this argument is how to define a "child." And are a child and a minor the same thing. Let's not go down that road, and say that, squicking your moral qualms or not, what goes on here is legal. And the OP is asking for it if he/she's going to go around condemning people for the art they make on objective grounds instead of, oh, say, legal grounds.

[kinneas.livejournal.com]

I think you mean "subjective", and you're implying somehow that the law is NOT?