case: ([ Nii; Heh. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-08-12 06:24 pm

[ SECRET POST #219 ]


⌈ Secret Post #219 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 103 secrets from Secret Submission Post #032.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Monday, August 12th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2007-08-12 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
The problem with the "artistic merit" argument is that the images in question were fairly obviously drawn to titillate. While obscenity is subjunctive, looking at the images in question does not evoke thoughts of "what masterful composition" or "what a deep understanding of the characters," but rather, "Harry is getting sucked off by a dog." (okay, that's not the image that was deleted, but the point remains, it was pretty blatant porn.)

There are major differences between Lolita and Debbie Does Dallas. And to me, this image falls towards the more obscene end of the spectrum.