case: ([ Nii; Heh. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-08-12 06:24 pm

[ SECRET POST #219 ]


⌈ Secret Post #219 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 103 secrets from Secret Submission Post #032.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Monday, August 12th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

7.

(Anonymous) 2007-08-13 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
I don't agree. Child porn is illegal to protect the real, live minors that would be hurt or exploited by it. These are fictional minors. They cannot be hurt or exploited. They have to rights.

Saying drawings of child porn is illegal because child porn is illegal is like saying drawings of murder should be illegal because murder is illegal. Drawings, unless directed at someone else with the intent to be hateful, don't hurt anyone.

Before anyone asks, no, I don't like 'shota'.

Also, I must add in that the age of consent in the US just baffles me. 18? What? Teens have been having sex and heck even getting married since ancient times. Where I live, it's 14, and I think that is perfectly reasonable. Heck, even 16, though I think even that's a little high, would be better.

Also, I think that a lot of teens in anime series look old enough that liking them doesn't make you a pedo. Example, Kabuto from Naruto is 19 at the start of the series, but doesn't look that much older than another character, Sasuke, who is underage. I don't think liking Sasuke makes you ayn more of a 'pedo' than liking Kabuto would, but that's just me.