case: ([ Nii; Heh. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-08-12 06:24 pm

[ SECRET POST #219 ]


⌈ Secret Post #219 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 103 secrets from Secret Submission Post #032.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Monday, August 12th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] rekallthegreat.livejournal.com 2007-08-13 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
7. Pedophiles will and do jerk off to normal pictures of children. Pedophiles get off on real children, not fake ones (and especially not fake ones who look like adults). Does this mean that any picture with a child in it should be banned from LJ? No. It means banning actual pedophiles from LJ and LJ staff not using the excuse "BUT IT'S NOT AGAINST THE TOS!!!!!!!" when attempts to get them off are made.

12. Considering Himawari and Kohane also make comments on them, yes fans would continue to ship them even if Yuuko wasn't a character. What do you expect when three characters canonly make comments on them? Of course that pairing would develop a lot of fans! If slashing male characters together bugs you, don't read CLAMP; they're yaoi fans themselves after-all.

18. Then don't read CLAMP. It's that simply. Seriously it's not that hard to avoid it. It's not like CLAMP topics are a common presence on sites like [livejournal.com profile] fanficrants or Fandom_Wank.