fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2120 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2120 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

16.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #303.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I assume the problem is that you're equating normal with physically/mentally sound/whole/etc. and disregarding the fact that being born with disfigurements or impairments isn't 'not normal' in a way that changes someone's basic humanity.

Wanting to have something you don't or having been born under different circumstances isn't relative to being normal or not.

So it's a semantics issue about the word "normal" - where one person is using it to mean "sound/whole/good" and the other is using it to mean "the accepted norm" - and not the idea of changing itself?

Pretty much. Yay semantics!

[ SECRET POST #2120 ]

no subject

no subject

no subject