Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-10-22 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #2120 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2120 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #303.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
That and McCarthyism. J'accuse.
It's like... reverse Rush Limbaugh or something.
That's exactly how I word it every time. The end goal is supposedly "equality and understanding"? I keep asking how we're going to get there with the tactic "agree with me that you're a bad person". I mean, half the time when some radical is raising awareness, it's in the form of "you have X-privilege and you need to recognize that". After that, what do they want? I have my hearing, for example. I'm very grateful that I do. I know some people don't, and that they need accommodations, and they should have them. What do you want after that? The answer seems to be "I just want you to feel bad for having what you have".
I don't think the radical internet activists know what they want or how to get it, or even how to make a real positive difference. I think they know it, and that's why they dogpile people for innocent mistakes when simply pointing out an error and then forgiving works nine out of ten times. Most of all, they don't seem to realize that people arguing back is usually because the person does feel bad about the mistake and is trying to say "I'm not a bad person".