Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-10-27 03:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #2125 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2125 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 124 secrets from Secret Submission Post #304.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat x 4 and counting. Bets? ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: oh THAT argument
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 12:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: oh THAT argument
The people most at risk from anti-trans bathroom policies are trans people forced to use the wrong bathroom and people (trans or not) being gender policed by people who think they're predators.
Re: oh THAT argument
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 01:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: oh THAT argument
"Oh, sorry officer, I just happened to be in this bathroom and accidentally raped someone?"
"Oh, that's fine then, off you go!"
Re: oh THAT argument
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 01:26 am (UTC)(link)Re: oh THAT argument
Re: oh THAT argument
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 02:18 am (UTC)(link)I think anon means that, say, it was a bathroom that was not frequented by a lot of people. Say there were two people in it. A predator dressed as woman, and a born female. If a man walks into the woman's bathroom the woman would immediate be on guard, and either raise a fuss or leave. If they believe it's another woman, though, they will carry on business as usual. Bathroom stalls are narrow with only one exit.
There is also the matter of non-physical assault and crimes, such as taking pictures of women covertly or simply watching them. It doesn't seem trolly to me.
Re: oh THAT argument
Re: oh THAT argument
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 02:44 am (UTC)(link)I can think of a solve:
1. Make most bathrooms in small venues single-stall and non-assigned. Outside door locks.
2. For large facilities with multiple stalls, do like some Asian bathrooms and have an open main door with lockable stalls. That way the woman/man, trans or otherwise, is secure and private when using the facilities, and when washing their hands or whatnot are in an open area where people can see and therefore are less likely to be attacked.
Re: oh THAT argument
Re: oh THAT argument
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 03:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: oh THAT argument
Re: oh THAT argument
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 11:26 am (UTC)(link)Re: oh THAT argument
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 03:08 am (UTC)(link)