case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-11-03 02:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #2132 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2132 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 100 secrets from Secret Submission Post #305.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Warning: discussion of sexual coercion

(Anonymous) 2012-11-03 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I typed up a long response, then realized it basically boiled down to this:

Coerced sex is just an attempt to do an end-run around rape by getting the victim to say "yes."

A "yes" in this sort of case is not really consent to sex, it's consent to opt-out of the alternative.

I haven't read this play, but I'd say Isabella was not selfish and your professor seems to be too hung up on semantics to consider how the people involved would actually feel.