[ SECRET POST #2133 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2133 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 083 secrets from Secret Submission Post #305.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[misstwist]

"Cultural appropriation" IS NOT another way of saying "pro-segregation" or "anti-miscegenation" - WTF!?

"Cultural appropriation" is generally used to describe the cherry-picking of unprivileged/minority cultural practices by the dominant culture/privileged class, thereby divorcing said cultural practice from historical and cultural meaning, e.g., white people wearing dreadlocks.

Please explain how being of mixed descent could be interpreted as "cultural appropriation."

[(Anonymous)]

1) when someone marries into another culture and they take on that culture (ie. white woman wears a sari on her wedding day to her Indian husband) they get called cultural appropriation

2) ignores and attacks mixed families via adoption (ie. someone could be white adopted into a Japanese family)

3) attacks mixed kids who look more like one parent than the other (ie. a half white/half Chinese kid comes out looking white, and is forced to deny half of their culture or they get called out for cultural appropriation)

[misstwist]

None of those are correct interpretations. The people making those arguments are wrong and racist and morons.