Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-11-09 06:05 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #2138 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2138 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

[Cabin in the Woods]
__________________________________________________
02.

[Hanna Is Not A Boy's Name]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Vampire Diaries]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

[009 RE:CYBORG]
__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
07. [SPOILERS for Elementary]

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for Supernatural]

__________________________________________________
09. [SPOILERS for Journey Into Mystery 2011/Young Avengers 2012]

__________________________________________________
10. [SPOILERS for Skyfall]

__________________________________________________
[ -----TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
11. [WARNING for abuse]

[Chris Brown / Jaejoong (JYJ)]
__________________________________________________
12. [WARNING for incest]

__________________________________________________
13. [WARNING for abuse]

__________________________________________________
14. [WARNING for eating disorders]

__________________________________________________
15. [WARNING for suicide]

[Edna and Harvey: Harvey's New Eyes]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #305.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-09 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)Yes, it annoys me too, can you tell? Actually, it doesn't even annoy me that much that she's in all the adaptations as a prominent character, because I think she's awesome, and if she could get a decent adaptation that wasn't 'Sherlock's long lost love' or 'supervillain', I would welcome that with open arms.
OP
(Anonymous) 2012-11-10 04:42 pm (UTC)(link)Oh, this! I don't mind Sherlock having a love interest or Irene being that love interest but "long lost love" thing annoys me too, as well as love at first sight. I wouldn't mind if someone did a love story with them, but in a new way or at least closer to canon, where Irene had a husband and wasn't interested in Sherlock..
no subject
Since I'm not a book!Sherlock fan, I don't mind her showing up, but I kind of wished she'd not made it at the end of the BBC version.. I'm okay if she never comes back. I like my asexual Sherlock just fine.
no subject
I guess it must've been a big deal that ACD actually wrote about a woman who managed to outsmart Holmes, but I dunno. Of course, it was also the first Sherlock Holmes story I ever read, so I think I might have been expecting something a big more exciting than his usual little short stories given her reputation.
no subject
(Personally, I thought Milverton was a much better villain for a story arc.)
On that note, I think Violet Hunter from "Copper Beeches" would be a great female character to be adapted (and the story she's in is great, too). But, no, let's keep going back to the same two characters over and over (and throw in "Hounds" for variety) and just act like the 57 other stories that didn't feature Adler or Moriarty don't even exist!
no subject
no subject
And sadly, I'm betting no one but canon Holmes fans (and maybe people who caught the Granada version) even know who we're talking about, Which is kinda my point.
no subject
no subject
And Copper Beeches! My goddess, that story actually gave me nightmares when I first read it as a child. Waay creepier than Hound, to me at least.
no subject
The cool thing about Beeches is that it could be adapted pretty easily without much change. Even with cellphones and the like. I mean, even if Violet could sent a text saying she was in danger, it's not much help if noone can get out to the house in time to save her...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-10 12:06 am (UTC)(link)now I'm depressed about Sherlock Holmes adaptations
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-10 12:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-10 04:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Hell, I think the same thing about canon!Irene, really, but so many adaptations fuck her characterization up...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-10 12:01 am (UTC)(link)The Irene Adler thing is less comprehensible. I think it's because - you start out with a few things using her as an important character, and then she becomes a character that the general public is extremely familiar with, and it makes it easier to include her. You know, a bit of a reinforcing loop kind of thing.
I've always liked the Holmesian theory that Milverton was one of Moriarty's pawns, and that Holmes' defeat (such as it was) of Milverton was one of the things which led to the final clash between Holmes and Moriarty. And it does make me wonder why no one has taken that concept up, even in the context of a Moriarty storyline.
Or any of the other excellent Holmes stories that never really get adapted. Now I'm getting all worked up about this.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-10 01:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject