Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-11-19 05:26 pm
[ SECRET POST #2148 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2148 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 080 secrets from Secret Submission Post #307.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - doing a bit of troll-weeding ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-19 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)Most people know the story/recognize the image of Jesus even if they don't know (or care) about the finer details. It's highly unlikely that someone who googled "resurrection" and found a picture of Jesus doesn't know who it is or why Google supplied it.
And try being less of an asshole to people right off the bat, huh?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-19 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)I just think the OP was being funny. Sure, perhaps not in the most tasteful way, but I don't think they were trying to be overtly disrespectful or rude - this is a YMMV moment, but since the rest of the secret was flippant and off-hand, why not take the whole thing in the spirit it seems to have been intended? But then, I'm often surprised when people are offended or upset by this sort of thing, and I double-take at it. Since everyone else here recognises the image, and we're clearly OK with attributing its source material, why the issue that the OP wants to make a joke of it?
Still, like I said, this level of sensitivity something I don't come across often. *shrug* If the original commenter finds it unpleasant or off-putting, more power to them! And if I'm being an outright asshole, then I'm sorry. They're saying they find it offensive, I'm saying I find that odd; we're both entitled to our opinions, but you're right, I could have been nicer. I intended to be flippant - I didn't intend to be a total dick. It's probably too late at night for me to make the distinction, so original anon, if I crossed the line and seriously upset you, I'm sorry. (But I do still think the secret was funny.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:20 am (UTC)(link)It's called a joke.
Asshole.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:22 am (UTC)(link)And the bug is happy where he is. Quit hating.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-11-20 01:56 am (UTC)(link)