[ SECRET POST #2148 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2148 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 080 secrets from Secret Submission Post #307.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - doing a bit of troll-weeding ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Butting in here

[(Anonymous)]

1. The economy initially took a nosedive under George Bush (social and fiscal conservative, also a "businessmen"). Maybe he should've done a better job of keeping it running, and if he had the Republican party could've held onto the White House?

2. Private industry is a very, very different game from public administration. "Businessmen" skills don't automatically translate. I'm not saying they can't be helpful in improving efficiency, but certain things that government provides (parks, transportation improvements, regulations, expanding communications, public goods in general) make no sense in profit-earning terms. So I don't think there's that much of an inherent advantage in having a "businessman" running the country, especially since historically, their record is mixed.

3. There aren't just two parties/candidates out there. Gary Johnson, as a Libertarian, is socially progressive and fiscally conservative; if you wanted to vote your conscience, that's a valid alternative that wouldn't have screwed anyone over.

But look, Romeny-voting anon, don't despair. The Democratic party (and the fact that it's only really got the Executive branch and half of the Legislative) isn't going to be able to get much done. Y'all will get your chance again, if you maybe smarten up about treating minorities like crap and stop it with the rape stuff.